Government • 2015

Hasičský záchranný sbor hlavního města Prahy

IČO 70886288

Suppliers showing "red flags" are seen quite often. Large volume of money is spent without open competition.

Show average values  
66%
Bidder participation
53%
Winner concentration
76%
Pro-competitive tools
35%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
38%
Competitive contracting
58%
Consistent conduct
56%
Journal data quality
46%
Buyer profile data quality
61%
Supplier rating
0%
Information provision

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

66%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Technické zhodnocení automobilových žebříků AZ30
Přebudování a generální opravy vozidel
2
Ø1 in industry
Nákup cisternových automobilových stříkaček
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
2
Ø2 in industry
Nákup cisternových automobilových stříkaček
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
2
Ø2 in industry
Nákup cisternové automobilové stříkačky (CAS)
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
3
Ø2 in industry
Nákup cisternové automobilové stříkačky II.
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

53%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Fire & Safety Systems spol. s r.o.
 6 23,495,127
Wiss Czech, s.r.o.
 2 14,538,656
Luing Pyrex, spol. s r.o.
 1 10,760,000
Strojírna Potůček s.r.o.
 1 5,112,155
Kobit, spol. s r.o.
 1 2,305,000
Other suppliers 1 1,898,730

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

76%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (1 from 0)
Nonprice competition 57% (4 from 7)
Division into lots 29% (2 from 7)
E-auction 0% (0 from 7)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 7)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

35%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 59,679,101
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 434,924,085
Total 494,603,186

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

38%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Nákup cisternových automobilových stříkaček
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek 		- 10,760,000
Oprava automobilového žebříku (AZ30)
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody) 		- 2,166,667

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

58%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 9%
Cancelled contracts 27%
Average requirements modifications count 0.20

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

56%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 12)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 12)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 12)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

46%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 50% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.35 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

61%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 50% (6 from 12)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 8% (1 from 12)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 33% (4 from 12)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 56%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.