State-owned enterprises • 2022 • past ranking

Vojenský technický ústav, s.p.

IČO 24272523

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Buyer does not support competition by using e-auctions, lots or extended deadlines.

Show average values  
31%
Bidder participation
87%
Winner concentration
17%
Pro-competitive tools
100%
Legal misconduct
9%
Competitive contracting
79%
Consistent conduct
77%
Journal data quality
26%
Buyer profile data quality
91%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

31%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
TACP 4
Security, fire-fighting, police and defence equipment
1
Ø2 in industry
Podvěsná výzbroj
Security, fire-fighting, police and defence equipment
1
Ø2 in industry
Podvěsná výzbroj II
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry
VLIS
Software package and information systems
1
Ø1 in industry
VLIS
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

87%
average 83%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
OMNIPOL a.s.
 3 120,701,535
PRAMACOM-HT, spol. s r.o.
 2 80,656,071
NET-SYSTEM s.r.o.
 5 70,942,113
AKERMANN ELECTRONIC PRAHA, spol. s r.o.
 23 69,062,057
FreeDivision s.r.o.
 1 51,320,008
Other suppliers 132 332,246,406

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

9%
average 76%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
HLAS ACCS - VCS
Technical exclusivity 		- 53,360,503
SW Deep Secure
Technical exclusivity 		- 51,320,008
Nákup radiostanic RF7800W
Technical exclusivity 		- 31,143,641
Letecké akumulátory
Technical exclusivity 		- 10,300,000
VTOL bezpilotní prostředky s příslušenstvím
Research and development 		- 8,822,924

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

79%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 14%
Average requirements modifications count 0.48
Average decision length 53.38 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

77%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 29% (19 from 66)
Procedure type not published 11% (7 from 66)
Missing buyer ID 11% (7 from 66)
Missing call for tenders 3% (2 from 66)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 66)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 66)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

26%
average 44%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 48% (zakázek z 64 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.53 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 64 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 0 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 1 zakázka
500k - 1m Kč 47 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 58 zakázek

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

91%
average 91%
There is insufficient data for score calculation. The indicator is not included in the evaluation and it is going to be taken into account next year.