Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Zábřeh

IČO 00303640

Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Court deemed all complaints against buyer invalid or insignificant.

88.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

48%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce budovy smuteční síně
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce ulice Smetanova
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry
Sdružené služby dodávky elektřiny pro město Zábřeh, jeho příspěvkové organizace, sbory dobrovolných hasičů a společnosti s majetkovou účastí města
Electricity
4
Ø2 in industry
Záchytné parkoviště u dopravního terminálu v Zábřehu
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry
Dešťová kanalizace Václavov
Construction work
9
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

82%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
VHH THERMONT s.r.o.
6 38,590,742
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
2 13,475,000
ČEZ ESCO, a.s.
1 9,293,603
STRABAG a.s.
1 8,217,447
Navláčil stavební firma, s.r.o.
1 7,777,090
Other suppliers 52 141,136,742

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

66%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 137,630,606
Small scale tenders 113,339,580
Unregulated purchases 332,114,434
Total 583,084,620

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

90%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce budovy smuteční síně
Contract modification
22,197,630 1,944,593 (+9%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 12)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 12)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 12)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

69%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 92% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.83 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 12 tenders under the law)
0-250K 4 tenders
250K-500K 4 tenders
500K-1000K 13 tenders
1000K+ 25 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.