State-owned enterprises • 2022 • past ranking

Centrum výzkumu Řež s.r.o.

IČO 26722445

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

Show average values  
24%
Bidder participation
48%
Winner concentration
15%
Pro-competitive tools
100%
Legal misconduct
1%
Competitive contracting
71%
Consistent conduct
100%
Journal data quality
34%
Buyer profile data quality
91%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

24%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Obnova systému ochran a řízení jaderného reaktoru LVR-15 - náhrada detektorů neutronového toku v kanálech spouštěcího měření výkonu
Emergency and security equipment
1
Ø3 in industry
Rekonstrukce stacionárního dozimetrického systému STADOS reaktoru LVR-15
Checking and testing apparatus
1
Ø1 in industry
Komponenty kompresního šroubení a armatur Swagelok pro experimentální zařízení
Structural products and parts except prefabricated buildings
1
Ø3 in industry
Úklidové služby Plzeň
Cleaning services
5
Ø4 in industry
Komponenty Swagelok pro experimentální zařízení
Structural products and parts except prefabricated buildings
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

48%
average 83%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
ÚJV Řež, a. s.
 5 144,500,000
ALTA, a.s.
 1 75,884,758
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
 3 13,979,370
VF, a.s.
 3 9,970,300
ŠKODA JS a.s.
 1 9,895,000
Other suppliers 30 64,080,602

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

15%
average 37%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 7)
Nonprice competition 5% (1 from 20)
Division into lots 10% (2 from 20)
E-auction and DPS 0% (0 from 20)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 20)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

1%
average 76%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Nuclear fuel supply for Research reactor LVR-15
Technical exclusivity 		- 75,884,758
Přívod chladicí vody
Technical exclusivity 		- 61,500,000
Dodatek č. 2 - Smlouva o poskytování služeb v oblasti působnosti atomového zákona a souvisejících předpisů
Technical exclusivity 		- 36,500,000
Dodatek č. 1 ke Smlouvě o poskytování služby na chlazení reaktoru LVR-15
Technical exclusivity 		- 25,000,000
Supply of the CHOUCA MT device
Technical exclusivity 		- 4,097,938

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

71%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 14%
Average requirements modifications count 0.29
Average decision length 136.00 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 33)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 33)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 33)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 33)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 33)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 33)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

34%
average 44%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 78% (zakázek z 32 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.97 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 32 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 0 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 4 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 4 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 9 zakázek

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

91%
average 91%
There is insufficient data for score calculation. The indicator is not included in the evaluation and it is going to be taken into account next year.