Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Slaný

IČO 00234877

The supplier portfolio is relatively broad. Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases.

105.
ranking
71%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

50%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Multifunkční sportovní hala Slaný
Construction work
12
Ø4 in industry
"Technická a dopravní infrastruktura pro výstavbu rodinných domů v lokalitě Háje - I. etapa"
Construction work for highways, roads
5
Ø5 in industry
Zimní stadion Slaný-rekonstrukce střešního pláště včetně odvlhčení haly
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
"Připojení obce Želevčice na kanalizační řad města Slaný - II. vyhlášení"
Construction work for water and sewage pipelines
4
Ø4 in industry
Modernizace kuchyně základní školy č.p. 821, ul. Rabasova, Slaný - I. etapa
Catering equipment
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

99%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
METALL QUATRO spol. s r.o.
1 98,979,931
ALGON, a.s.
1 46,187,672
Energie - stavební a báňská a.s.
1 27,135,896
Metrostav a.s.
1 23,497,507
EKOSTAVBY Louny s.r.o.
3 19,665,500
Other suppliers 122 418,772,266

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

27%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 25% (2 from 8)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 44)
Division into lots 7% (3 from 44)
E-auction 0% (0 from 44)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 44)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

62%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 391,139,027
Small scale tenders 83,174,794
Unregulated purchases 756,559,946
Total 1,230,873,768

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

90%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
"Připojení obce Želevčice na kanalizační řad města Slaný - II. vyhlášení"
Contract modification
23,497,507 2,994,650 (+13%)
"Technická a dopravní infrastruktura pro výstavbu rodinných domů v lokalitě Háje - I. etapa"
Contract modification
46,187,672 2,130,214 (+5%)
Stavební úpravy ploch a kanalizace před objekty A, B a vjezdu do areálu nemocnice
Contract modification
6,577,563 1,951,435 (+30%)
Spořitelna č. p. 99 rekonstrukce bytů severního křídla
Contract modification
6,888,893 901,214 (+14%)
Rozšíření topolové cesty - úprava na cestu pro cyklisty a pěší
Contract modification
7,149,980 416,054 (+6%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

57%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 29%
Average requirements modifications count 1.43
Average decision length 90.71 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

94%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 46)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 46)
Missing buyer ID 9% (4 from 46)
Missing call for tenders 15% (7 from 46)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 46)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 46)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

47%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 60% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.64 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 45 tenders under the law)
0-250K 13 tenders
250K-500K 26 tenders
500K-1000K 29 tenders
1000K+ 22 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.