State-owned enterprises • 2022 • past ranking

Řízení letového provozu České republiky, státní podnik (řlp Čr, s.p.)

IČO 49710371

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

Show average values  
33%
Bidder participation
73%
Winner concentration
52%
Pro-competitive tools
93%
Legal misconduct
1%
Competitive contracting
48%
Consistent conduct
95%
Journal data quality
73%
Buyer profile data quality
91%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

33%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Přestavba provozních sálů objektu IATCC
Buildings associated with transport
3
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce objektu VÚ Jeneč a novostavba vysílacího střediska Jeneč
Buildings associated with transport
3
Ø4 in industry
Stavební připravenost pro instalaci RCOM zařízení a Obnova ILS 22 LKMT, Přijímací středisko LKKV
Buildings associated with transport
1
Ø4 in industry
Dodávka, servis a modifikace ATC konzolí a nízkých ATC stolů
Miscellaneous transport equipment and spare parts
2
Ø2 in industry
Letištní objekt ŘLP LKKV - modernizace
Buildings associated with transport
4
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

73%
average 83%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
IFIELD COMPUTER CONSULTANCY LIMITED - organizační složka
 15 617,240,181
CS SOFT a.s.
 22 455,650,733
Thales LAS FRANCE SAS
 3 285,165,554
ATRAK a.s.
 7 182,993,646
Metrostav a.s.
 1 111,837,227
Other suppliers 327 1,128,951,048

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

52%
average 37%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 29% (10 from 34)
Nonprice competition 23% (11 from 48)
Division into lots 12% (6 from 48)
E-auction and DPS 0% (0 from 48)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 48)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

1%
average 76%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
TopSky - framework agreement on system modifications
Authorship rights 		- 218,898,856
Rozvoj WALDO/ASTA2
Authorship rights 		- 201,523,200
Servisní podpora ATM systémů
Authorship rights 		- 93,303,240
Upgrade DPS IATCC a IDP, WALDO, Bypass pro HIFI SIMU TopSky a APP Praha
Authorship rights 		- 89,956,516
ESUP NS 4.0
Authorship rights 		- 68,788,640

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

48%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 3%
Cancelled contracts 23%
Average requirements modifications count 0.84
Average decision length 100.97 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

95%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 120)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 120)
Missing buyer ID 6% (7 from 120)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 120)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 120)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 120)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

73%
average 44%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 99% (zakázek z 115 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.14 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 115 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 31 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 19 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 67 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 123 zakázek

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

91%
average 91%
There is insufficient data for score calculation. The indicator is not included in the evaluation and it is going to be taken into account next year.