Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Vimperk

IČO 00250805

Buyer has seriously violated procurement law. The competition for contracts is high.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

65%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Modernizace komunikací II. třídy P12 A - část 3
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry
Vimperk, areál U Sloupů napojení na městskou kanalizační a vodovodní síť - II. etapa
Construction work for water and sewage pipelines
5
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy objektu, Hřbitovní č.p. 313, Vimperk
Construction work for houses
7
Ø4 in industry
Projekt regenerace veřejného prostranství na sídlišti Míru ve Vimperku - 2. a 3. etapa
Construction work for highways, roads
3
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce hygienických zařízení a zdravotní instalace v ZŠ TGM Vimperk
Construction work for school buildings
1
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

77%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
GSI INVEST s.r.o.
3 43,762,556
STRABAG a.s.
1 43,741,620
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
1 14,692,016
VKB stavby s.r.o.
2 13,577,315
KVINT Vlachovo Březí spol. s r.o.
1 11,601,726
Other suppliers 9 70,545,577

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

61%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 239,678,308
Small scale tenders 8,264,944
Unregulated purchases 425,444,141
Total 673,387,393

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

98%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Stavební úpravy objektu, Hřbitovní č.p. 313, Vimperk
Contract modification
16,507,000 645,841 (+4%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 14)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 14)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 14)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 14)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 14)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 14)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

38%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 86% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.57 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 14 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 3 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.