State-owned enterprises • 2022 • past ranking

Vop Cz, s.p.

IČO 00000493

SUPPLIER_FEEDBACK_FALSE_2 Uncompetitive procedures are overused.

Show average values  
68%
Bidder participation
82%
Winner concentration
38%
Pro-competitive tools
100%
Legal misconduct
14%
Competitive contracting
83%
Consistent conduct
90%
Journal data quality
65%
Buyer profile data quality
20%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

68%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
MT/016/2020 Tlusté plechy
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
6
Ø2 in industry
MT 012/2020 Plechy Linde
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
5
Ø2 in industry
Náhradní díly na T-72
Security, fire-fighting, police and defence equipment
3
Ø2 in industry
MT/053/2021 Masivní plechy Linde
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry
MT/38/2021 Dodávky masivních plechů Linde
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
3
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

82%
average 83%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
COSMOTRADE, spol. s r. o.
 9 2,975,913,306
EXPONO Steelforce, a. s.
 40 892,506,132
RAVEN CZ a.s.
 13 141,685,452
TESKO STEEL SP. Z O.O.
 10 105,858,691
Schmolz+Bickenbach s.r.o.
 47 91,805,925
Other suppliers 327 683,043,910

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

38%
average 37%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 12% (5 from 42)
Nonprice competition 3% (3 from 98)
Division into lots 51% (50 from 98)
E-auction and DPS 3% (3 from 98)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 98)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

14%
average 76%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Opravy pohoných jednotek a převodovek tanků T72MCZ
Technical exclusivity 		- 217,560,033
Originální náhradní díly výrobce Renault Truck Defence za účelem obchodu a servisu
Technical exclusivity , Authorship rights 		- 119,854,768
Dodávka 10 kusů podvozků Tatra pro CAP 6.
Technical exclusivity , Authorship rights , Additional works 		- 60,290,000
Dodávka 10kusů cisternových nástaveb pro CAP
Previous tender without bids , Technical exclusivity , Authorship rights 		- 35,065,800
Senzory Lidar
Technical exclusivity 		- 5,322,378

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

83%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 5%
Cancelled contracts 5%
Average requirements modifications count 0.41
Average decision length 62.94 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

90%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 2% (2 from 104)
Procedure type not published 6% (6 from 104)
Missing buyer ID 11% (11 from 104)
Missing call for tenders 12% (12 from 104)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 104)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 104)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

65%
average 44%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 88% (zakázek z 96 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.70 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 96 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 21 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 48 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 64 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 140 zakázek

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

20%
average 91%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.