Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Vratimov

IČO 00297372

Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. The competition for contracts is low.

51.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

35%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Nová budova koupaliště ve Vratimově
Construction work
0
Ø4 in industry
Nová budova koupaliště ve Vratimově – II.
Construction work
7
Ø4 in industry
Odkanalizování lokality Zaryjská, Vratimov a výstavba stok F4 a I1
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry
Výběr provozovatele kanalizace a ČOV města Vratimov
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry
Vratimov, Horní Datyně - chodník ul. Vratimovská (úsek mezi ul. Krajní a ul. Nad Točnou)
Installation works of walkways
8
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

98%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
PS BRNO, s.r.o.
2 57,980,447
OHLA ŽS, a.s.
1 30,965,945
Severomoravské vodovody a kanalizace Ostrava a.s.
2 21,009,803
IDS - Inženýrské a dopravní stavby Olomouc a.s.
1 19,049,333
INTOZA s.r.o.
1 8,500,000
Other suppliers 30 149,680,263

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

37%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (1 from 2)
Nonprice competition 17% (1 from 6)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 6)
E-auction 0% (0 from 6)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 6)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

77%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 298,479,912
Small scale tenders 75,776,142
Unregulated purchases 264,411,241
Total 638,667,295

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

88%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Nová budova koupaliště ve Vratimově – II.
Contract modification
57,269,907 2,746,971 (+5%)
Rekonstrukce chodníků a MK ul. U Mateřské školy
Contract modification
4,426,968 709,522 (+17%)
Vratimov, Horní Datyně - chodník ul. Vratimovská (úsek mezi ul. Krajní a ul. Nad Točnou)
Contract modification
19,049,333 397,824 (+3%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 7)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 7)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 7)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

66%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 86% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.14 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 7 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 14 tenders
1000K+ 16 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.