Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. The competition for contracts is low.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
---|---|
Nová budova koupaliště ve Vratimově
Construction work |
0
Ø4 in industry |
Nová budova koupaliště ve Vratimově – II.
Construction work |
7
Ø4 in industry |
Odkanalizování lokality Zaryjská, Vratimov a výstavba stok F4 a I1
Construction work |
6
Ø4 in industry |
Výběr provozovatele kanalizace a ČOV města Vratimov
Buyer profile data - no industry specification |
1
Ø2 in industry |
Vratimov, Horní Datyně - chodník ul. Vratimovská (úsek mezi ul. Krajní a ul. Nad Točnou)
Installation works of walkways |
8
Ø4 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
---|---|---|
PS BRNO, s.r.o. |
2 | 57,980,447 |
OHLA ŽS, a.s. |
1 | 30,965,945 |
Severomoravské vodovody a kanalizace Ostrava a.s. |
2 | 21,009,803 |
IDS - Inženýrské a dopravní stavby Olomouc a.s. |
1 | 19,049,333 |
INTOZA s.r.o. |
1 | 8,500,000 |
Other suppliers | 30 | 149,680,263 |
Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
---|---|---|
PS BRNO, s.r.o. |
2 | 57,980,447 |
OHLA ŽS, a.s. |
1 | 30,965,945 |
Severomoravské vodovody a kanalizace Ostrava a.s. |
2 | 21,009,803 |
IDS - Inženýrské a dopravní stavby Olomouc a.s. |
1 | 19,049,333 |
INTOZA s.r.o. |
1 | 8,500,000 |
JANKOSTAV s.r.o. |
3 | 6,161,573 |
STRABAG a.s. |
1 | 4,426,968 |
SDO Technika s.r.o. |
2 | 2,354,000 |
ČEZ ESCO, a.s. |
1 | 2,123,105 |
Alpiq Retail CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 1,914,209 |
Ivánek-Zeman, v.o.s. |
2 | 1,861,070 |
VYKRUT zahradní služby a.s. |
1 | 1,692,769 |
BAROSTAV s.r.o. |
1 | 1,591,515 |
Hana Lisníková |
1 | 1,554,926 |
minimalistic s.r.o. |
1 | 1,489,980 |
Miroslav Špálek |
1 | 1,292,532 |
CLIMART s.r.o. |
1 | 1,256,092 |
Skanska a.s. |
1 | 1,250,000 |
MDS Ostrava s.r.o. |
1 | 1,014,945 |
Beáta Philipp |
1 | 991,734 |
ELSPOL Elektro s.r.o. |
1 | 947,662 |
RSE Project s.r.o. |
1 | 926,670 |
CITY INVEST OSTRAVA, spol.s r.o. |
1 | 826,200 |
Schindler CZ, a.s. |
1 | 730,000 |
Roofdier s.r.o. |
1 | 658,296 |
Milan Novák |
1 | 578,512 |
FORM, spol. s r. o. |
1 | 554,850 |
DOPRAVOPROJEKT Ostrava a.s. |
1 | 525,760 |
PROJEKTSTUDIO EUCZ, s.r.o. |
1 | 520,000 |
DOPRAVOPROJEKT, a.s. |
1 | 512,250 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
Tool | Contracts count |
---|---|
Extended deadlines | 50% (1 from 2) |
Nonprice competition | 17% (1 from 6) |
Division into lots | 0% (0 from 6) |
E-auction | 0% (0 from 6) |
Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 6) |
Contract | Extended deadlines | Nonprice competition | Division into lots | E-auction | Innovative procedure |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nová budova koupaliště ve Vratimově – II. | |||||
Odkanalizování lokality Zaryjská, Vratimov a výstavba stok F4 a I1 | |||||
Nová budova koupaliště ve Vratimově | |||||
Oprava fasády a střechy III. etapa, přístavba šaten ZŠ Masarykovo náměstí 192, Vratimov | |||||
Rekonstrukce chodníků a MK ul. U Mateřské školy | |||||
Vratimov, Horní Datyně - chodník ul. Vratimovská (úsek mezi ul. Krajní a ul. Nad Točnou) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
---|---|
Public procurement | 298,479,912 |
Small scale tenders | 75,776,142 |
Unregulated purchases | 264,411,241 |
Total | 638,667,295 |
Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
---|---|
Durable property purchases | 423,908,776 |
Material consumption | 9,651,166 |
Energy consumption | 27,767,150 |
Other consumption | 260,822 |
Sold goods | 85,893 |
Activation of durable property | 0 |
Activation of consumable property | 0 |
Change of stock | 0 |
Maintenance and repairs | 46,729,500 |
Travel costs | 333,325 |
Representation costs | 328,847 |
In-house services | 0 |
Other services | 106,991,321 |
Small long-term property costs | 14,630,033 |
Other costs | 7,980,462 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
---|---|---|
Nová budova koupaliště ve Vratimově – II. Contract modification |
57,269,907 | 2,746,971 (+5%) |
Rekonstrukce chodníků a MK ul. U Mateřské školy Contract modification |
4,426,968 | 709,522 (+17%) |
Vratimov, Horní Datyně - chodník ul. Vratimovská (úsek mezi ul. Krajní a ul. Nad Točnou) Contract modification |
19,049,333 | 397,824 (+3%) |
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
---|---|---|
Nová budova koupaliště ve Vratimově – II. Contract modification |
57,269,907 | 2,746,971 (+5%) |
Rekonstrukce chodníků a MK ul. U Mateřské školy Contract modification |
4,426,968 | 709,522 (+17%) |
Vratimov, Horní Datyně - chodník ul. Vratimovská (úsek mezi ul. Krajní a ul. Nad Točnou) Contract modification |
19,049,333 | 397,824 (+3%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
Type of flaw | Contracts count |
---|---|
Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 7) |
Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 7) |
Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 7) |
Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 7) |
Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 7) |
Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 7) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
Check | Result | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 86% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.14 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 7 tenders under the law) |
|
Contract | Type of flaw |
---|---|
Vratimov, Horní Datyně - chodník ul. Vratimovská (úsek mezi ul. Krajní a ul. Nad Točnou) | Tender not found on any profile |
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.