Regions • 2022 • past ranking

Středočeský kraj

IČO 70891095

There are not many contract extensions and ammendments. Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations.

7.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

46%
average 46%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
II/102 hr. hl. města Prahy-Štěchovice, rekonstrukce, ETAPA I.
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Zajištění bezbariérového přístupu na nástupiště v ŽST Roztoky u Prahy
Construction work for bridges and tunnels, shafts and subways
2
Ø4 in industry
II/606 VELKÁ DOBRÁ – NOVÉ STRAŠECÍ, REKONSTRUKCE SILNICE A MOSTŮ - stavba
Construction work
5
Ø4 in industry
II/191 Rožmitál pod Třemšínem – hr. kraje
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
II/272, most ev.č. 272-004 přes Labe za obcí Litol a rekonstrukce komunikace II/272 - I. Etapa
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

93%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
STRABAG a.s.
9 527,272,779
KELLER-speciální zakládání, spol. s r.o.
1 318,800,383
Skanska a.s.
3 225,541,654
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
3 197,192,110
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
3 143,478,595
Other suppliers 727 3,914,210,296

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

30%
average 46%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 18% (12 from 68)
Nonprice competition 5% (7 from 142)
Division into lots 7% (10 from 142)
E-auction 1% (1 from 142)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 142)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

92%
average 94%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 5,500,778,384
Small scale tenders 869,765,842
Unregulated purchases 1,080,254,993
Total 7,450,799,219

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

87%
average 63%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Zajištění bezbariérového přístupu na nástupiště v ŽST Roztoky u Prahy
Contract modification
203,828,671 25,969,152 (+13%)
II/101 Jesenice, obchvat - II. Etapa - stavba
Contract modification
105,594,739 20,713,616 (+20%)
II/112 Struhařov, rekonstrukce silnice
Contract modification
76,961,718 9,269,406 (+13%)
II/610 Brandýs nad Labem - Rekonstrukce křižovatky Pražská - Průmyslová a části komunikace v ul. Pražská
Contract modification
73,499,835 8,179,645 (+12%)
Tramvajová trať Kobylisy - Zdiby, PD
Contract modification
36,842,850 8,049,600 (+22%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

39%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 4%
Cancelled contracts 11%
Average requirements modifications count 1.83
Average decision length 157.10 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

96%
average 94%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 1% (1 from 146)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 146)
Missing buyer ID 1% (2 from 146)
Missing call for tenders 3% (5 from 146)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 146)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 1% (2 from 146)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

73%
average 60%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 78% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.77 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 137 tenders under the law)
0-250K 182 tenders
250K-500K 110 tenders
500K-1000K 94 tenders
1000K+ 142 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 84%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.