State-owned enterprises • 2022 • past ranking

Diamo, státní podnik

IČO 00002739

Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

20.
ranking
72%
Zindex
Show average values  
32%
Bidder participation
95%
Winner concentration
28%
Pro-competitive tools
96%
Legal misconduct
95%
Competitive contracting
77%
Consistent conduct
93%
Journal data quality
64%
Buyer profile data quality
80%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

32%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Sanace kontaminovaného území Trojice
Environmental services
6
Ø2 in industry
Oxid vápenatý
Construction structures and materials; auxiliary products to construction (except electric apparatus)
1
Ø2 in industry
NÁPRAVNÁ OPATŘENÍ - LAGUNY OSTRAMO, nadbilanční kaly, 2. Realizační etapa
Refuse and waste related services
2
Ø1 in industry
Poskytování služby privátního cloudu a rozšíření IT infrastruktury
Information technology services
0
Ø1 in industry
Odstranění nekontrolovaných výstupů zemních plynů z hlubinných průzkumných vrtů v oblasti Václavovice, Dolní Domaslavice, Příbor-východ a Trojanovice - II. etapa Relikvidace 5 hlubinných průzkumných
Services related to the oil and gas industry
2
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

95%
average 83%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Vápenka Čertovy schody a.s.
 3 731,880,850
Veolia Komodity ČR, s.r.o.
 3 454,921,860
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
 5 296,598,081
AVE CZ odpadové hospodářství s.r.o.
 1 279,852,500
EKOM CZ a.s.
 1 214,183,653
Other suppliers 1,160 2,245,822,922

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

28%
average 37%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 9% (6 from 69)
Nonprice competition 6% (12 from 209)
Division into lots 13% (27 from 209)
E-auction and DPS 0% (1 from 209)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 209)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

95%
average 76%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Nerezové potrubí - rekonstrukce technologického mostu ZCHÚ - K2 - nové 1 - část 2
Previous tender without bids 		- 6,965,575
Provoz čistírny lagunových vod
Technical exclusivity 		- 5,944,000
Oprava čerpacího agregátu KSB
Technical exclusivity 		- 4,144,504
Oprava čerpacího agregátu KSB
Technical exclusivity 		- 3,549,728
Opravy a servis strojů JCB, CASE a CAT - nové
Previous tender without bids 		- 3,000,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

77%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 3%
Cancelled contracts 17%
Average requirements modifications count 0.23
Average decision length 46.87 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

93%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 1% (3 from 229)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 229)
Missing buyer ID 0% (1 from 229)
Missing call for tenders 1% (2 from 229)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 229)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 229)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

64%
average 44%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 70% (zakázek z 211 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.09 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 211 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 414 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 192 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 162 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 164 zakázek

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 91%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.