State-owned enterprises • 2022

Správa silnic Olomouckého kraje, příspěvková organizace

IČO 70960399

Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

20.
ranking
72%
Zindex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

40%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
II/437 Lipník nad Bečvou – hranice Zlínského kraje
Construction work for highways, roads
4
Ø5 in industry
II/315 hranice okresu Ústí nad Orlicí – Zábřeh - Leština
Construction work for highways, roads
3
Ø5 in industry
II/441 křiž. R35 - hr. kraje Moravskoslezského, úseky betonové vozovky
Construction work for buildings relating to road transport
5
Ø5 in industry
III/37346 LUDMÍROV - DĚTKOVICE - KLADKY - 4 ÚSEK
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
II/450 hr. Kraje Vidly-Domašov, křiž. s I/44
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

84%
average 83%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
STRABAG a.s.
18 333,926,467
KARETA s.r.o.
28 272,072,566
Skanska a.s.
13 266,198,784
OHL ŽS, a.s.
8 193,768,048
SILNICE MORAVA s.r.o.
11 189,055,226
Other suppliers 390 1,684,480,509

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

30%
average 37%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 40)
Nonprice competition 75% (123 from 165)
Division into lots 10% (16 from 165)
E-auction and DPS 0% (0 from 165)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 165)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

88%
average 76%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
II/437 Lipník nad Bečvou – hranice Zlínského kraje
Contract modification
123,117,336 24,226,257 (+20%)
II/450 hr. Kraje Vidly-Domašov, křiž. s I/44
Contract modification
53,398,301 12,302,379 (+24%)
III/4384, III/4387, III/4389 Všechovice - průtah
Contract modification
21,910,482 5,993,014 (+28%)
III/37762, 37760 Seloutky- Domamyslice- křiž. II/366- SO 102
Contract modification
34,621,000 3,569,201 (+11%)
III/36916 Ruda - průtah (Hrabenov)
Contract modification
34,810,119 3,144,464 (+10%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

74%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 10%
Average requirements modifications count 0.36
Average decision length 82.35 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 1% (1 from 168)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 168)
Missing buyer ID 1% (2 from 168)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 168)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 168)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 168)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

62%
average 44%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 98% (zakázek z 160 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.55 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 160 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 1 zakázka
250k - 500k Kč 3 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 88 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 160 zakázek

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

91%
average 91%
There is insufficient data for score calculation. The indicator is not included in the evaluation and it is going to be taken into account next year.