State-owned enterprises • 2022

Státní pokladna Centrum sdílených služeb, s. p.

IČO 03630919

Competitions are open to multiple bidders. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.

20.
ranking
72%
Zindex
Show average values  
43%
Bidder participation
83%
Winner concentration
26%
Pro-competitive tools
100%
Legal misconduct
100%
Competitive contracting
68%
Consistent conduct
97%
Journal data quality
57%
Buyer profile data quality
91%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

43%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Zajištění podpory provozu Integrovaného informačního systému Státní pokladny - Část 2: Zajištění služeb podpory provozu a rozvoje IISSP v oblasti RISRE (Rozpočtový informační systém - realizace rozpočtu).
Software-related services
1
Ø1 in industry
Zajištění podpory provozu Integrovaného informačního systému Státní pokladny - Část 3: Zajištění služeb podpory provozu a rozvoje IISSP v oblasti CSÚIS (Centrální systém účetních informací státu).
Software-related services
1
Ø1 in industry
Zajištění podpory provozu Integrovaného informačního systému Státní pokladny - Část 1: Zajištění služeb podpory provozu a rozvoje IISSP v oblasti RISPR (Rozpočtový informační systém - příprava rozpočtu).
Software-related services
1
Ø1 in industry
JEDNOTNÝ BEZPEČNOSTNÍ SYSTÉM DATOVÉHO CENTRA ZELENEČ
Surveillance and security systems and devices
2
Ø2 in industry
Datové propojení datových center Zeleneč a Na Vápence
Data services
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

83%
average 83%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
ANECT a.s.
 42 148,690,395
FlyCom s.r.o.
 1 67,032,000
C42 s.r.o.
 1 63,907,000
MIBCON a.s.
 1 46,976,000
T-Mobile Czech Republic a.s.
 6 44,887,107
Other suppliers 138 405,058,178

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

26%
average 37%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 41)
Nonprice competition 1% (1 from 71)
Division into lots 25% (18 from 71)
E-auction and DPS 4% (3 from 71)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 71)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 76%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

68%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 10%
Average requirements modifications count 0.71
Average decision length 78.68 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 71)
Procedure type not published 1% (1 from 71)
Missing buyer ID 6% (4 from 71)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 71)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 71)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 71)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

57%
average 44%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 94% (zakázek z 62 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.61 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 62 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 4 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 6 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 18 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 67 zakázek

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

91%
average 91%
There is insufficient data for score calculation. The indicator is not included in the evaluation and it is going to be taken into account next year.