State-owned enterprises • 2022

Správa a údržba silnic Pardubického kraje

IČO 00085031

Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition. SUPPLIER_FEEDBACK_TRUE_1

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

54%
average 47%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

77%
average 83%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
M-SILNICE a.s.
16 358,810,256
Chládek a Tintěra, Pardubice a.s.
15 228,079,459
MADOS MT s.r.o.
14 169,282,488
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
7 148,269,788
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
11 140,392,757
Other suppliers 266 844,363,452

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

30%
average 37%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 8% (2 from 25)
Nonprice competition 69% (84 from 122)
Division into lots 2% (2 from 122)
E-auction and DPS 0% (0 from 122)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 122)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

68%
average 76%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Modernizace silnice III/32246 Hrochův Týnec – křiž. s III/32248
Outside directive scope
- 34,431,128
Modernizace silnice II/358 Litomyšl – Česká Třebová
Contract modification
148,047,801 32,362,049 (+22%)
Křičeň - průtah, rekonstrukce silnic III/3237 a III/3238
Outside directive scope
- 22,983,254
Obnova mostu ev.č. 36311-2 Brněnec - Březová nad Svitavou
Contract modification
22,795,971 6,278,388 (+28%)
Modernizace silnice III/3542 Česká Rybná - průtah
Contract modification
21,878,491 5,673,611 (+26%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

72%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 2%
Cancelled contracts 7%
Average requirements modifications count 0.67
Average decision length 105.30 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 124)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 124)
Missing buyer ID 1% (1 from 124)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 124)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 124)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 124)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

37%
average 44%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 99% (zakázek z 111 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.08 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 111 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 0 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 0 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 0 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 7 zakázek

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%

Buyer did receive excellent feedback from its tender participants.