State-owned enterprises • 2022

Krajská správa a údržba silnic Vysočiny, příspěvková organizace

IČO 00090450

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

41%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
I/23,II/351 Třebíč - oprava mostů a PHS
Bridge renewal construction work
5
Ø4 in industry
II/128 křiž. I/19 - Černovice
Construction work for highways, roads
5
Ø5 in industry
III/03810 Havlíčkův Brod - ul. Mírová, úsek č. 3
Construction work for highways, roads
3
Ø5 in industry
Asfaltová směs určená pro strojní zpracování. - cestmistrovství Moravské Budějovice
Petroleum products, fuel, electricity and other sources of energy
1
Ø2 in industry
Asfaltová směs určená pro strojní zpracování. - cestmistrovství Pelhřimov
Petroleum products, fuel, electricity and other sources of energy
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

80%
average 83%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
COLAS CZ, a.s.
29 330,841,824
PORR a.s.
18 216,413,592
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
13 155,017,739
OHL ŽS, a.s.
8 153,280,870
Skanska a.s.
12 150,431,795
Other suppliers 371 1,167,790,874

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

45%
average 37%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 18% (9 from 49)
Nonprice competition 6% (10 from 178)
Division into lots 30% (54 from 178)
E-auction and DPS 1% (1 from 178)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 178)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

93%
average 76%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
II/112 Telč – Želetava – 1. etapa
Contract modification
16,686,240 3,765,459 (+23%)
III/4051 křiž. II/405 - Puklice
Contract modification
16,375,923 3,745,855 (+23%)
II/134, II/402, III/13423 Batelov průtah křiž. náměstí Míru
Contract modification
34,937,638 2,303,382 (+7%)
III/3518 Měřín – průtah a most ev. č. 3518-1
Contract modification
28,468,100 1,947,840 (+7%)
III/34731 Žebrákov - most ev. č. 34731-2
Contract modification
5,855,529 1,742,631 (+30%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

77%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 2%
Cancelled contracts 2%
Average requirements modifications count 0.15
Average decision length 78.83 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

87%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 184)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 184)
Missing buyer ID 2% (3 from 184)
Missing call for tenders 6% (11 from 184)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 184)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 2% (3 from 184)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 44%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 3% (zakázek z 180 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.03 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 180 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 0 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 0 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 0 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 0 zakázek

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

91%
average 91%
There is insufficient data for score calculation. The indicator is not included in the evaluation and it is going to be taken into account next year.