State-owned enterprises • 2022

Správa a údržba silnic Jihomoravského kraje, příspěvková organizace kraje

IČO 70932581

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

7.
ranking
76%
Zindex
Show average values  
56%
Bidder participation
88%
Winner concentration
38%
Pro-competitive tools
100%
Legal misconduct
89%
Competitive contracting
57%
Consistent conduct
99%
Journal data quality
79%
Buyer profile data quality
100%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

56%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
II/374 Rájec průtah, IV. stavba
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
III/379 37 Blansko přemostění
Works for complete or part construction and civil engineering work
5
Ø5 in industry
II/422 Svatobořice Mistřín - křiž. s II/380
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
III/0501 Slavkov u Brna průtah
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry
II/373 Brno, ul. Bělohorská
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads
4
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

88%
average 83%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
FIRESTA-Fišer, rekonstrukce, stavby a.s.
 25 325,516,370
IMOS Brno, a.s.
 16 281,590,605
PORR a.s.
 18 263,590,693
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
 31 248,312,761
Metrostav DIZ s.r.o.
 1 218,225,694
Other suppliers 1,332 2,270,317,913

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

38%
average 37%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 6% (5 from 83)
Nonprice competition 10% (21 from 210)
Division into lots 21% (44 from 210)
E-auction and DPS 2% (5 from 210)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 210)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

89%
average 76%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
II/418 ÚJEZD U BRNA – OTNICE, 2. STAVBA
Contract modification 		38,952,344 9,781,030 (+26%)
III/41311 Oleksovice průtah
Contract modification 		33,496,963 6,056,031 (+19%)
II/362 Olešnice průtah, 1.stavba
Contract modification 		43,903,049 5,892,733 (+14%)
II/414 DRNHOLEC - MIKULOV, MOST EV.Č. 414-007
Contract modification 		43,832,545 5,424,607 (+13%)
II/379 Tišnov, ul. Brněnská –realizace překládky sítě elektronických komunikací
Not disclosed 		- 3,964,537

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

57%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 3%
Cancelled contracts 8%
Average requirements modifications count 0.87
Average decision length 123.00 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (1 from 213)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 213)
Missing buyer ID 0% (1 from 213)
Missing call for tenders 1% (3 from 213)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 213)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 213)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

79%
average 44%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 92% (zakázek z 201 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.26 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 201 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 247 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 114 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 95 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 177 zakázek

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%

Buyer did receive excellent feedback from its tender participants.