State-owned enterprises • 2022

Správa a údržba silnic Plzeňského kraje, p.o.

IČO 72053119

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. SUPPLIER_FEEDBACK_FALSE_1

11.
ranking
75%
Zindex
Show average values  
51%
Bidder participation
80%
Winner concentration
35%
Pro-competitive tools
100%
Legal misconduct
94%
Competitive contracting
74%
Consistent conduct
99%
Journal data quality
67%
Buyer profile data quality
70%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

51%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Městský okruh úsek Křimická - Karlovarská
Site preparation work
5
Ø4 in industry
I/20 a II/231 v Plzni, Plaská - Na Roudné - Chrástecká, 2. etapa
Road construction works
7
Ø5 in industry
II/169 a II/145 Dlouhá Ves - Radešov, úsek B a C
Road-repair works
2
Ø5 in industry
Přeložka silnice II/187 Číhaň - Kolinec
Bridge construction work
7
Ø4 in industry
II/230 Stříbro – dálnice D5, úsek 1
Construction work for highways, roads
3
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

80%
average 83%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
BERGER BOHEMIA a.s.
 33 1,423,867,700
Metrostav a.s.
 6 1,001,678,286
ROBSTAV stavby k.s.
 25 598,297,860
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
 22 437,490,771
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
 18 388,074,240
Other suppliers 656 2,641,766,112

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

35%
average 37%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 18% (11 from 61)
Nonprice competition 6% (13 from 221)
Division into lots 11% (25 from 221)
E-auction and DPS 0% (0 from 221)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 221)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

94%
average 76%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
I/20 a II/231 v Plzni, Plaská - Na Roudné - Chrástecká, 2. etapa
Contract modification 		493,663,326 35,553,982 (+8%)
Městský okruh úsek Křimická - Karlovarská
Contract modification 		1,791,832,812 15,199,075 (+1%)
II/605 Mýto - průtah
Contract modification 		34,579,725 12,633,873 (+37%)
II/201 Všehrdy - křižovatka II/232
Contract modification 		24,407,095 4,831,952 (+20%)
II/231 Zruč - ul. Plzeňská
Contract modification 		19,481,278 4,755,648 (+25%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

74%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 2%
Cancelled contracts 9%
Average requirements modifications count 0.93
Average decision length 61.42 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (1 from 221)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 221)
Missing buyer ID 3% (6 from 221)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 221)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 221)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 221)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

67%
average 44%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 91% (zakázek z 213 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.42 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 213 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 46 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 57 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 204 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 157 zakázek

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

70%
average 91%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.