Small cities • 2022

Městská část Praha 22

IČO 00240915

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations.

Show average values  
72%
Bidder participation
100%
Winner concentration
50%
Pro-competitive tools
68%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
58%
Competitive contracting
29%
Consistent conduct
100%
Journal data quality
7%
Buyer profile data quality
80%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

72%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Polyfunkční dům Pitkovice
Houses construction work
8
Ø5 in industry
Výstavba DPS Betlímek
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry
Lávka ulice Ke Kříži - 2. etapa
Various surface works
0
Ø3 in industry
Odbahnění cukrovarského rybníka
Landscaping work
4
Ø2 in industry
Oprava chodníku v ulici K Netlukám
Paths and other metalled surfaces
5
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

100%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Raeder & Falge s.r.o.
 1 75,530,000
Podzimek a synové s.r.o.
 1 24,924,895
VISTORIA CZ a.s.
 1 24,924,895
PAS Natura s.r.o.
 1 8,000,068
HES stavební s.r.o.
 1 5,437,422
Other suppliers 7 123,521,936

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 8)
Nonprice competition 57% (12 from 21)
Division into lots 10% (2 from 21)
E-auction 0% (0 from 21)
Innovative procedure 19% (4 from 21)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

68%
average 68%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

58%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Polyfunkční dům Pitkovice
Contract modification 		75,530,000 13,937,243 (+19%)
Výstavba DPS Betlímek
Contract modification 		49,849,789 5,542,821 (+12%)
Odbahnění cukrovarského rybníka
Contract modification 		8,000,068 1,126,408 (+15%)
Dodávka gastro zařízení školní jídelny
Contract modification 		2,666,477 122,649 (+5%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

29%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 33%
Cancelled contracts 8%
Average requirements modifications count 1.58
Average decision length 78.50 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 21)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 21)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 21)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 21)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 21)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 21)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

7%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 50% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.44 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 16 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.