Small cities • 2022

Městská část Praha 22

IČO 00240915

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
Polyfunkční dům Pitkovice
Houses construction work
Ø5 in industry
Výstavba DPS Betlímek
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Lávka ulice Ke Kříži - 2. etapa
Various surface works
Ø3 in industry
Odbahnění cukrovarského rybníka
Landscaping work
Ø2 in industry
Oprava chodníku v ulici K Netlukám
Paths and other metalled surfaces
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Raeder & Falge s.r.o.
1 75,530,000
Podzimek a synové s.r.o.
1 24,924,895
1 24,924,895
PAS Natura s.r.o.
1 8,000,068
HES stavební s.r.o.
1 5,437,422
Other suppliers 7 123,521,936

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 8)
Nonprice competition 57% (12 from 21)
Division into lots 10% (2 from 21)
E-auction 0% (0 from 21)
Innovative procedure 19% (4 from 21)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Polyfunkční dům Pitkovice
Contract modification
75,530,000 13,937,243 (+19%)
Výstavba DPS Betlímek
Contract modification
49,849,789 5,542,821 (+12%)
Odbahnění cukrovarského rybníka
Contract modification
8,000,068 1,126,408 (+15%)
Dodávka gastro zařízení školní jídelny
Contract modification
2,666,477 122,649 (+5%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 21)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 21)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 21)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 21)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 21)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 21)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 50% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.44 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 16 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.