Small cities • 2022

MČ Praha-Lysolaje

IČO 00231207

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
SO 107 Společenský dům Lysolaje
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
SO 108 Bytový dům a centrální část
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
SO 109 Komunitní centrum a zahrada
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
SO 110 Mateřská škola a atriová zahrada
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Zařízení pro provoz a údržbu zeleně Lysolaje
Construction work
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
ALSTAP s.r.o.
1 79,697,367
RS stavební s.r.o.
1 70,125,423
IAPS TEN s.r.o.
1 38,886,421
DEREZA, společnost s ručením omezeným
1 34,386,152
PSP - GDS, s.r.o.
1 13,575,219
Other suppliers 1 79,697,367

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 17% (1 from 6)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 10)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 10)
E-auction 0% (0 from 10)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 10)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 50%
Average requirements modifications count 1.83
Average decision length 40.33 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 10)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 10)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 10)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 40% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.30 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 10 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.