Small cities • 2020

Městská část Praha 17

IČO 00231223

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Buyer profile has high number of errors.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

76%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Víceúčelové sportovní centrum Na Chobotě
Multi-purpose sports facilities construction work
9
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce varny v ZŠ genpor. Fr. Peřiny, Laudova 1024, Praha 6 - Řepy
Construction work for kindergarten buildings
1
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce varny v ZŠ genpor. Fr. Peřiny, Socháňova 1139, Praha 6 - Řepy
Construction work for school buildings
4
Ø3 in industry
Technická vybavenost Řepy - ul. Hekova a ul. Augustova, Praha 6 - Řepy
Construction work for buildings relating to road transport
3
Ø3 in industry
Nákup nové velkoobjemové požární cisterny
Water-tender vehicles
1
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

100%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
PKS stavby a.s.
1 96,800,000
GEOSAN GROUP a.s.
1 96,800,000
DEREZA, společnost s ručením omezeným
1 20,484,316
Elektrostav Praha s.r.o.
1 15,906,605
WALCO CZ spol. s r.o.
1 9,804,467
Other suppliers 5 16,193,497

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

20%
average 32%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

58%
average 58%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

43%
average 89%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Víceúčelové sportovní centrum Na Chobotě
Contract modification
290,400,000 65,717,653 (+23%)
Dům s pečovatelskou službou v Praze Řepích - zapracování schválených změn do původní projektové dokumentace
Not disclosed
- 1,850,001

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

64%
average 64%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

79%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 10)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 10)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 10% (1 from 10)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 43%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 20% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.10 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 10 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders