Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Buyer profile has high number of errors.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
---|---|
Víceúčelové sportovní centrum Na Chobotě
Multi-purpose sports facilities construction work |
9
Ø4 in industry |
Rekonstrukce varny v ZŠ genpor. Fr. Peřiny, Laudova 1024, Praha 6 - Řepy
Construction work for kindergarten buildings |
1
Ø4 in industry |
Rekonstrukce varny v ZŠ genpor. Fr. Peřiny, Socháňova 1139, Praha 6 - Řepy
Construction work for school buildings |
4
Ø3 in industry |
Technická vybavenost Řepy - ul. Hekova a ul. Augustova, Praha 6 - Řepy
Construction work for buildings relating to road transport |
3
Ø3 in industry |
Nákup nové velkoobjemové požární cisterny
Water-tender vehicles |
1
Ø1 in industry |
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
---|---|
Víceúčelové sportovní centrum Na Chobotě
Multi-purpose sports facilities construction work |
9
Ø4 in industry |
Rekonstrukce varny v ZŠ genpor. Fr. Peřiny, Laudova 1024, Praha 6 - Řepy
Construction work for kindergarten buildings |
1
Ø4 in industry |
Rekonstrukce varny v ZŠ genpor. Fr. Peřiny, Socháňova 1139, Praha 6 - Řepy
Construction work for school buildings |
4
Ø3 in industry |
Technická vybavenost Řepy - ul. Hekova a ul. Augustova, Praha 6 - Řepy
Construction work for buildings relating to road transport |
3
Ø3 in industry |
Nákup nové velkoobjemové požární cisterny
Water-tender vehicles |
1
Ø1 in industry |
Poskytování bezpečnostních služeb
Administration, defence and social security services |
7
Ø3 in industry |
Výkon technického dozoru investora stavby Víceúčelové sportovní centrum Na Chobotě
Engineering design services for the construction of civil engineering works |
4
Ø3 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
---|---|---|
PKS stavby a.s. |
1 | 96,800,000 |
GEOSAN GROUP a.s. |
1 | 96,800,000 |
DEREZA, společnost s ručením omezeným |
1 | 20,484,316 |
Elektrostav Praha s.r.o. |
1 | 15,906,605 |
WALCO CZ spol. s r.o. |
1 | 9,804,467 |
Other suppliers | 5 | 16,193,497 |
Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
---|---|---|
PKS stavby a.s. |
1 | 96,800,000 |
GEOSAN GROUP a.s. |
1 | 96,800,000 |
DEREZA, společnost s ručením omezeným |
1 | 20,484,316 |
Elektrostav Praha s.r.o. |
1 | 15,906,605 |
WALCO CZ spol. s r.o. |
1 | 9,804,467 |
THT Polička, s.r.o. |
1 | 6,389,000 |
Bartoň a Partner s.r.o. |
1 | 4,239,580 |
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s. |
1 | 2,879,136 |
ŠUMAVAPLAN, spol. s r. o. |
1 | 1,850,001 |
DOMISTAV CZ a.s. |
1 | 835,780 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
Tool | Contracts count |
---|---|
Extended deadlines | 0% (0 from 2) |
Nonprice competition | 62% (5 from 8) |
Division into lots | 0% (0 from 8) |
E-auction | 0% (0 from 8) |
Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 8) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
---|---|---|
Víceúčelové sportovní centrum Na Chobotě Contract modification |
290,400,000 | 65,717,653 (+23%) |
Dům s pečovatelskou službou v Praze Řepích - zapracování schválených změn do původní projektové dokumentace Not disclosed |
- | 1,850,001 |
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
---|---|---|
Víceúčelové sportovní centrum Na Chobotě Contract modification |
290,400,000 | 65,717,653 (+23%) |
Dům s pečovatelskou službou v Praze Řepích - zapracování schválených změn do původní projektové dokumentace Not disclosed |
- | 1,850,001 |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
Type of flaw | Contracts count |
---|---|
Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 10) |
Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 10) |
Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 10) |
Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 10) |
Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 10) |
Contract modification by more than 50 % | 10% (1 from 10) |
Contract | Type of flaw |
---|---|
Výkon technického dozoru investora stavby Víceúčelové sportovní centrum Na Chobotě | Contract modification by more than 50 % |
Víceúčelové sportovní centrum Na Chobotě | Missing supplier ID |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
Check | Result | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 20% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 1.10 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 10 tenders under the law) |
|