Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Městská část Praha 3

IČO 00063517

Buyer supports competition by providing extended deadlines for tender submissions. Buyer has seriously violated procurement law.

70.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

64%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Stavební úpravy a zateplení panelových domů v Praze 3, ulice Táboritská 15/22, 16/24, 17/26
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy panelových domů v Praze 3, ul. Blahoslavova 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, Roháčova 30
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Výzva k podání nabídky - Stavební úpravy panelových domů v Praze 3, ul. Blahoslavova 2,4,6,8,10 a Roháčova 30
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
4
Ø2 in industry
Elektronické podávání listovních zásilek pro Úřad městské části Praha 3 na dobu 5 let
Postal and telecommunications services
3
Ø2 in industry
ZŠ a MŠ náměstí Jiřího z Lobkovic 228121, Praha 3 - objekt Perunova - rekonstrukce rozvodů elektro a bezbariérové řešení objektu
Construction work
1
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

73%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
S u b t e r r a a.s.
2 317,496,000
GEOSAN GROUP a.s.
1 115,764,808
NEPRO stavební a.s.
1 115,764,808
AUSTUR s.r.o.
4 52,475,000
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
1 45,000,000
Other suppliers 50 876,153,404

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

68%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 31% (4 from 13)
Nonprice competition 28% (11 from 40)
Division into lots 8% (3 from 40)
E-auction 0% (0 from 40)
Innovative procedure 10% (4 from 40)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

68%
average 68%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

88%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Stavební úpravy panelových domů v Praze 3, ul. Blahoslavova 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, Roháčova 30
Contract modification
158,748,000 14,837,351 (+10%)
Obnova náměstí Jiřího z Poděbrad, Praha 3 - zpracování projektové dokumentace a zajištění výkonu autorského dozoru
Authorship rights
- 8,000,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 13%
Cancelled contracts 4%
Average requirements modifications count 0.42
Average decision length 99.00 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 44)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 44)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 44)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 44)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 44)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 44)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

44%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 95% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.50 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 38 tenders under the law)
0-250K 2 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 1 tender
1000K+ 7 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.