Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Loštice

IČO 00302945

Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.

88.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

20%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
ÚPRAVA VEŘEJNÉHO PROSTRANSTVÍ UL. POD LUŠTĚM - MÍSTNÍ KOMUNIKACE, CHODNÍKY, VEŘEJNÉ OSVĚTLENÍ
Construction work for highways, roads
8
Ø5 in industry
Uveřejnění Smlouvy o dílo - Mateřská škola-stavební úpravy-změna užívání na základní uměleckou školu - Loštice
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry
Přístavba hasičské zbrojnice - Loštice
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry
Uveřejnění smlouvy o dílo - "Úpravy uličního prostoru Malého náměstí v Lošticích a realizace místa pro přecházení na náměstí Míru v Lošticích"
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry
Uveřejnění Smlouvy o dílo -Úprava veřejného prostranství sídliště Sokolská
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

90%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
KARETA s.r.o.
2 12,368,114
MoliMex Ingtrade s.r.o.
2 4,111,095
Vít Košák
1 4,025,900
Zdeněk Zdráhal
3 3,751,450
RÝMSTAV CZ spol. s r.o.
1 3,598,332
Other suppliers 24 37,653,761

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

27%
average 27%
Average values displayed

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

68%
average 68%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 3)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 3)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 3)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 3)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 3)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 3)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

71%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 3 tenders under the law)
0-250K 1 tender
250K-500K 1 tender
500K-1000K 7 tenders
1000K+ 15 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.