Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
---|---|
ÚPRAVA VEŘEJNÉHO PROSTRANSTVÍ UL. POD LUŠTĚM - MÍSTNÍ KOMUNIKACE, CHODNÍKY, VEŘEJNÉ OSVĚTLENÍ
Construction work for highways, roads |
8
Ø5 in industry |
Uveřejnění Smlouvy o dílo - Mateřská škola-stavební úpravy-změna užívání na základní uměleckou školu - Loštice
Buyer profile data - no industry specification |
1
Ø2 in industry |
Přístavba hasičské zbrojnice - Loštice
Buyer profile data - no industry specification |
1
Ø2 in industry |
Uveřejnění smlouvy o dílo - "Úpravy uličního prostoru Malého náměstí v Lošticích a realizace místa pro přecházení na náměstí Míru v Lošticích"
Buyer profile data - no industry specification |
1
Ø2 in industry |
Uveřejnění Smlouvy o dílo -Úprava veřejného prostranství sídliště Sokolská
Buyer profile data - no industry specification |
1
Ø2 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
---|---|---|
KARETA s.r.o. |
2 | 12,368,114 |
MoliMex Ingtrade s.r.o. |
2 | 4,111,095 |
Vít Košák |
1 | 4,025,900 |
Zdeněk Zdráhal |
3 | 3,751,450 |
RÝMSTAV CZ spol. s r.o. |
1 | 3,598,332 |
Other suppliers | 24 | 37,653,761 |
Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
---|---|---|
KARETA s.r.o. |
2 | 12,368,114 |
MoliMex Ingtrade s.r.o. |
2 | 4,111,095 |
Vít Košák |
1 | 4,025,900 |
Zdeněk Zdráhal |
3 | 3,751,450 |
RÝMSTAV CZ spol. s r.o. |
1 | 3,598,332 |
Dlažba Vysoké Mýto, s.r.o. |
1 | 3,509,099 |
Hroší stavby Morava a.s. |
1 | 2,586,074 |
TESPO - TOPENÁŘSKÉ CENTRUM s.r.o. |
1 | 2,508,864 |
ELKOPLAST CZ, s.r.o. |
1 | 2,242,000 |
EKOZIS spol. s r. o. |
1 | 2,191,789 |
SOCHAŘI,v.o.s. |
1 | 1,697,050 |
S A P. spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,560,000 |
Jan Lakomý |
1 | 1,495,108 |
Machovský s.r.o. |
1 | 1,394,363 |
ENVItech Bohemia s.r.o. |
1 | 1,083,000 |
LAZAM uničovská stavební s.r.o. |
1 | 1,014,020 |
Kompakta servis s.r.o. |
1 | 859,000 |
PW interier Jaroslav Horák s.r.o. |
1 | 655,345 |
MSS - projekt s.r.o. |
1 | 597,000 |
Ing. Martin Suchánek |
1 | 586,760 |
ČERNÍK s.r.o. |
1 | 552,098 |
František Zábojník |
1 | 528,413 |
Richard Prokop |
1 | 439,519 |
Skanska a.s. |
1 | 349,528 |
JD Decentia, s.r.o. |
1 | 178,110 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
Type of flaw | Contracts count |
---|---|
Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 3) |
Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 3) |
Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 3) |
Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 3) |
Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 3) |
Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 3) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
Check | Result | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 100% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 1.00 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 3 tenders under the law) |
|
Contract | Type of flaw |
---|---|
Cyklostezka Loštice - Moravičany: část 1-Cyklostezka, část 2-Veřejné osvětlení, část 3-Veřejná zeleň | Price inconsistent with Journal |
Cyklostezka Loštice - Moravičany: část 1-Cyklostezka, část 2-Veřejné osvětlení, část 3-Veřejná zeleň | Bidders insonsistent with Journal count |
ÚPRAVA VEŘEJNÉHO PROSTRANSTVÍ UL. POD LUŠTĚM - MÍSTNÍ KOMUNIKACE, CHODNÍKY, VEŘEJNÉ OSVĚTLENÍ | Price inconsistent with Journal |
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.