Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Enough firms are competing for contracts.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
---|---|
Bytový dům, ul. K Archivu 1993/2, Nový Jičín
Construction work |
11
Ø4 in industry |
Rekonstrukce střechy zimního stadionu v Novém Jičíně
Works for complete or part construction and civil engineering work |
4
Ø4 in industry |
Inženýrské sítě pro zástavbu RD Žilina, Za Školou, III. etapa
Construction work |
10
Ø4 in industry |
Revitalizace bytového domu Jičínská 275, Nový Jičín
Construction work |
3
Ø4 in industry |
Energetické úspory Revoluční 36 v Novém Jičíně
Construction work |
15
Ø4 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
---|---|---|
NOSTA, s.r.o. |
1 | 51,549,100 |
Navláčil stavební firma, s.r.o. |
1 | 40,384,240 |
PORR a.s. |
2 | 25,673,557 |
FABRIKO MORAVA, s.r.o. |
5 | 22,770,249 |
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o. |
5 | 19,772,596 |
Other suppliers | 119 | 348,528,174 |
Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
---|---|---|
NOSTA, s.r.o. |
1 | 51,549,100 |
Navláčil stavební firma, s.r.o. |
1 | 40,384,240 |
PORR a.s. |
2 | 25,673,557 |
FABRIKO MORAVA, s.r.o. |
5 | 22,770,249 |
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o. |
5 | 19,772,596 |
VYKI TOOLS GROUP s.r.o. |
13 | 18,725,500 |
ŠMÍD STAVEBNÍ s.r.o. |
1 | 13,270,515 |
ERDING, a.s. |
2 | 10,692,768 |
JAPSTAV MORAVA s.r.o. |
7 | 9,837,052 |
VERA, spol. s r.o. |
2 | 9,249,000 |
EUROGAS a.s. |
1 | 8,903,404 |
KEMOstav s.r.o. |
2 | 8,101,024 |
KÁMENBAU s.r.o. |
3 | 7,736,236 |
HAOSPOL s.r.o. |
1 | 6,744,363 |
VAE THERM, spol. s r.o. |
4 | 5,865,352 |
BIOMAROS, S.R.O. |
1 | 5,836,991 |
Šimek gass s.r.o. |
3 | 5,689,565 |
STELM s.r.o. |
6 | 4,811,461 |
Kooperativa pojišťovna, a.s., Vienna Insurance Group |
1 | 4,764,560 |
SILNICE.CZ s. r. o. |
1 | 4,577,095 |
ELTODO OSVĚTLENÍ, s.r.o. |
1 | 4,425,068 |
CERGOMONT s.r.o. |
1 | 4,248,248 |
E.ON Energie, a.s. |
1 | 4,113,586 |
Severomoravská stavební společnost s. r. o. |
2 | 3,406,591 |
JANKOSTAV s.r.o. |
1 | 2,995,086 |
STAREST s.r.o. |
1 | 2,767,725 |
T-Mobile Czech Republic a.s. |
1 | 2,713,488 |
UNISTAD spol. s r. o. |
1 | 2,434,664 |
ROSI LOGISTIK s.r.o. |
1 | 2,400,000 |
EFIOS stavební s.r.o. |
1 | 2,284,993 |
RADEKOV spol. s r.o. |
1 | 2,015,898 |
RI OKNA a.s. |
2 | 1,905,559 |
C SYSTEM CZ a.s. |
2 | 1,796,032 |
TOMÁŠ SKALÍK ATELIÉR s.r.o. |
2 | 1,766,386 |
INGDOP s.r.o. |
1 | 1,747,949 |
ROLS Beskyd, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,688,000 |
Jiří Novák |
1 | 1,632,164 |
Pragoclima, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,573,867 |
Enroll consulting s.r.o. |
1 | 1,562,212 |
Josef Frydrych - MYKOS |
1 | 1,562,212 |
Martin Kott |
1 | 1,539,570 |
MR Design CZ, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,390,000 |
ATELIÉR TOP KLIMA s.r.o. |
1 | 1,387,809 |
TC servis, s.r.o. |
2 | 1,340,639 |
H & B delta, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,169,752 |
TERA Systems s.r.o. |
1 | 998,935 |
Ing. Kamil Turek |
1 | 961,274 |
Vašežaluzie.cz s.r.o. |
1 | 952,807 |
TOPSOFT JKM spol. s r.o. |
1 | 843,555 |
Apptc.me s.r.o. |
1 | 797,771 |
APJAR - TEVYB s.r.o. |
1 | 768,825 |
AUTOKLEVER spol. s r.o. |
2 | 749,959 |
ING-FOREST s.r.o. |
1 | 744,254 |
DEMSTAV group, s.r.o. |
1 | 731,195 |
PENNANT PART s.r.o. |
1 | 719,271 |
Potrusil s.r.o. |
1 | 614,000 |
STAVPRESS SMART s.r.o. |
1 | 549,975 |
PERFECTED s.r.o. |
1 | 527,904 |
FORM, spol. s r. o. |
1 | 500,690 |
APC SILNICE s.r.o. |
1 | 459,000 |
ENGEL s.r.o. |
1 | 458,500 |
SOKRA, s.r.o. |
1 | 444,960 |
Perperikon s.r.o. |
1 | 437,312 |
VYSOKÁ ŠKOLA BÁŇSKÁ-TECHNICKÁ UNIVERZITA OSTRAVA |
2 | 428,099 |
ALSYKO security, s.r.o. |
1 | 406,999 |
PPS Kania s.r.o. |
1 | 378,000 |
Ing. arch. Martin Materna |
1 | 375,000 |
REDAL AKTIV CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 325,000 |
BENEPRO, a.s. |
1 | 290,000 |
UCHYTIL s.r.o. |
2 | 283,000 |
RSE Project s.r.o. |
1 | 257,000 |
SUDOP Project Plzeň a.s. |
1 | 237,350 |
PROKOP MOSTY s.r.o. |
1 | 234,000 |
STAVBAŘ - výrobní družstvo |
1 | 179,826 |
Jakub Jež |
1 | 152,000 |
EDUM.EU s.r.o. |
1 | 9,700 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
Tool | Contracts count |
---|---|
Extended deadlines | 33% (1 from 3) |
Nonprice competition | 8% (2 from 26) |
Division into lots | 8% (2 from 26) |
E-auction | 0% (0 from 26) |
Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 26) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
---|---|
Public procurement | 327,895,445 |
Small scale tenders | 171,526,346 |
Unregulated purchases | 412,341,984 |
Total | 911,763,774 |
Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
---|---|
Durable property purchases | 484,164,052 |
Material consumption | 25,599,735 |
Energy consumption | 42,746,672 |
Other consumption | 0 |
Sold goods | 0 |
Activation of durable property | 0 |
Activation of consumable property | 0 |
Change of stock | 792 |
Maintenance and repairs | 176,554,701 |
Travel costs | 1,387,489 |
Representation costs | 309,450 |
In-house services | 0 |
Other services | 155,150,195 |
Small long-term property costs | 16,447,653 |
Other costs | 9,403,034 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
---|---|---|
Bytový dům, ul. K Archivu 1993/2, Nový Jičín Contract modification |
51,549,100 | 9,738,121 (+19%) |
Rekonstrukce střechy zimního stadionu v Novém Jičíně Contract modification |
40,384,240 | 5,481,484 (+14%) |
Kryté stání Loučka u Nového Jičína, stavební úpravy vnitřních prostor, opatření proti vodě a úprava veřejného osvětlení Contract modification |
8,903,404 | 1,505,373 (+17%) |
Místní komunikace v Novém Jičíně Contract modification |
7,493,230 | 983,512 (+14%) |
Stavba Cyklostezky Nový Jičín - Hostašovice, úsek vojenská vlečka Contract modification |
6,538,106 | 802,029 (+13%) |
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
---|---|---|
Bytový dům, ul. K Archivu 1993/2, Nový Jičín Contract modification |
51,549,100 | 9,738,121 (+19%) |
Rekonstrukce střechy zimního stadionu v Novém Jičíně Contract modification |
40,384,240 | 5,481,484 (+14%) |
Kryté stání Loučka u Nového Jičína, stavební úpravy vnitřních prostor, opatření proti vodě a úprava veřejného osvětlení Contract modification |
8,903,404 | 1,505,373 (+17%) |
Místní komunikace v Novém Jičíně Contract modification |
7,493,230 | 983,512 (+14%) |
Stavba Cyklostezky Nový Jičín - Hostašovice, úsek vojenská vlečka Contract modification |
6,538,106 | 802,029 (+13%) |
Inženýrské sítě pro zástavbu RD Žilina, Za Školou, III. etapa Contract modification |
23,986,666 | 645,947 (+3%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
Type of flaw | Contracts count |
---|---|
Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 27) |
Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 27) |
Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 27) |
Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 27) |
Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 27) |
Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 27) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
Check | Result | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 100% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.15 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 27 tenders under the law) |
|
Contract | Type of flaw |
---|---|
Místní komunikace v Novém Jičíně | Supplier inconsistent with Journal |
Zajištění telekomunikačních služeb v mobilních sítích pro město Nový Jičín | Price inconsistent with Journal |
Informační systémy Městského úřadu Nový Jičín | Bid evaluation protocol missing |
Nákup elektrické energie pro objekty města a příspěvkové organizace města Nový Jičín na komoditní burze PXE | Payment information missing |
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.