Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Nový Jičín

IČO 00298212

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Enough firms are competing for contracts.

12.
ranking
78%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

75%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Bytový dům, ul. K Archivu 1993/2, Nový Jičín
Construction work
11
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce střechy zimního stadionu v Novém Jičíně
Works for complete or part construction and civil engineering work
4
Ø4 in industry
Inženýrské sítě pro zástavbu RD Žilina, Za Školou, III. etapa
Construction work
10
Ø4 in industry
Revitalizace bytového domu Jičínská 275, Nový Jičín
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Energetické úspory Revoluční 36 v Novém Jičíně
Construction work
15
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

96%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
NOSTA, s.r.o.
1 51,549,100
Navláčil stavební firma, s.r.o.
1 40,384,240
PORR a.s.
2 25,673,557
FABRIKO MORAVA, s.r.o.
5 22,770,249
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
5 19,772,596
Other suppliers 119 348,528,174

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

35%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 8% (2 from 26)
Division into lots 8% (2 from 26)
E-auction 0% (0 from 26)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 26)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

74%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 327,895,445
Small scale tenders 171,526,346
Unregulated purchases 412,341,984
Total 911,763,774

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

72%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Bytový dům, ul. K Archivu 1993/2, Nový Jičín
Contract modification
51,549,100 9,738,121 (+19%)
Rekonstrukce střechy zimního stadionu v Novém Jičíně
Contract modification
40,384,240 5,481,484 (+14%)
Kryté stání Loučka u Nového Jičína, stavební úpravy vnitřních prostor, opatření proti vodě a úprava veřejného osvětlení
Contract modification
8,903,404 1,505,373 (+17%)
Místní komunikace v Novém Jičíně
Contract modification
7,493,230 983,512 (+14%)
Stavba Cyklostezky Nový Jičín - Hostašovice, úsek vojenská vlečka
Contract modification
6,538,106 802,029 (+13%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 27)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 27)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 27)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 27)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 27)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 27)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

84%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.15 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 27 tenders under the law)
0-250K 5 tenders
250K-500K 18 tenders
500K-1000K 30 tenders
1000K+ 41 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.