Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Statutární město Třinec

IČO 00297313

Buyer has seriously violated procurement law. Buyer does not avoid following procurement law.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

34%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zajištění dopravní obslužnosti městskou autobusovou dopravou na území statutárního města Třinec
Road transport services
1
Ø4 in industry
Nadjezd Závodní
Construction work
5
Ø4 in industry
Parkovací objekt Sosna - opakování
Structures construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
„REKONSTRUKCE ULICE MALÉ JABLUNKOVSKÉ, TŘINEC“
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Sběrný dvůr Třinec
Refuse disposal and treatment
1
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

99%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
ARRIVA MORAVA a.s.
1 1,009,758,409
Metrostav Infrastructure a.s.
1 74,842,390
Beskydská stavební, a.s.
1 49,978,102
VYKRUT zahradní služby a.s.
6 29,592,687
Strojírny a stavby Třinec, a.s.
6 28,486,463
Other suppliers 142 1,496,575,742

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

4%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 4% (1 from 26)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 26)
E-auction 0% (0 from 26)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 26)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,472,161,355
Small scale tenders 279,908,244
Unregulated purchases 0
Total 1,596,315,508

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 29)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 29)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 29)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 29)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 29)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 29)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

64%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 80% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 25 tenders under the law)
0-250K 3 tenders
250K-500K 20 tenders
500K-1000K 41 tenders
1000K+ 56 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.