Small cities • 2020

Město Vyškov

IČO 00292427

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

38.
ranking
73%
Zindex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

17%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Výběr autobusového dopravce města Vyškova – 4 linky, na období od 1. 1. 2018
Road transport services
0
Ø2 in industry
Rekonstrukce domu Žižkova 1, 3, 5 Vyškov
Restoration work
2
Ø3 in industry
Oprava Masarykova náměstí, Vyškov
Construction work for pipelines, communication and power lines
4
Ø5 in industry
„Stavební úpravy komunikace ve školním statku“ – I. etapa a II. etapa
Construction work
4
Ø3 in industry
Regenerace - úpravy sídliště Smetanovo nábřeží - V. etapa
Construction work for pipelines, communication and power lines
3
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

87%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
JIMI Electronic Solutions, s.r.o.
1 27,557,355
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
3 26,687,490
WAGNER stavební spol. s r.o.
10 23,430,396
MROZEK a.s.
1 22,926,919
BS - IMEX, spol. s r.o.
3 7,158,190
Other suppliers 53 68,181,968

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

60%
average 32%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 50% (4 from 8)
Division into lots 25% (2 from 8)
E-auction and DPS 0% (0 from 8)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 8)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

57%
average 58%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 82,030,730
Small scale tenders 280,433,511
Unregulated purchases 769,138,339
Total 1,131,602,579

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 89%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

55%
average 64%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 20%
Cancelled contracts 20%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00
Average decision length 82.50 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

96%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 12% (1 from 8)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 8)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 8)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

88%
average 43%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (zakázek z 7 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.43 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 7 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 9 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 3 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 13 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 36 zakázek