Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Hodonín

IČO 00284891

Good buyer. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

12.
ranking
78%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

46%
average 51%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

87%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
8 78,371,526
Hrušecká stavební spol. s r.o.
4 52,966,789
OHLA ŽS, a.s.
1 52,479,339
ESOX, spol. s r.o.
1 50,652,892
SBD, spol. s r.o.
4 46,831,153
Other suppliers 91 480,901,945

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

60%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 42% (5 from 12)
Nonprice competition 12% (6 from 49)
Division into lots 4% (2 from 49)
E-auction 37% (18 from 49)
Innovative procedure 2% (1 from 49)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

61%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 458,020,706
Small scale tenders 142,627,617
Unregulated purchases 1,027,905,859
Total 1,628,554,182

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
DODÁVKA A ODBĚR TEPELNÉ ENERGIE PRO MĚSTO HODONÍN
Technical exclusivity
- 5,000,000
STRAVOVACÍ PAVILON ZOO HODONÍN – NOVOSTAVBA
Contract modification
11,990,700 25,368 (+1%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

92%
average 60%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 53)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 53)
Missing buyer ID 4% (2 from 53)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 53)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 53)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 53)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

63%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 49 tenders under the law)
0-250K 2 tenders
250K-500K 10 tenders
500K-1000K 18 tenders
1000K+ 21 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.