Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Blansko

IČO 00279943

Good buyer. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

21.
ranking
77%
zIndex
Show average values  
45%
Bidder participation
98%
Winner concentration
34%
Pro-competitive tools
68%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
100%
Competitive contracting
80%
Consistent conduct
100%
Journal data quality
66%
Buyer profile data quality
80%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

45%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
III/379 37 Blansko přemostění
Works for complete or part construction and civil engineering work
5
Ø4 in industry
ZŠ TGM přístavba jídelny a školní kuchyně
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Blansko - obnova podzámčí - Zámek 3
Construction work
0
Ø4 in industry
Blansko – most, komunikace a parkoviště u Salmova mlýna
Construction work for water and sewage pipelines
4
Ø5 in industry
Regenerace sídliště Zborovce, III. etapa
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads
4
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

98%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Metrostav DIZ s.r.o.
 1 218,225,694
IMOS Brno, a.s.
 1 65,899,822
MERTASTAV s.r.o.
 3 27,382,676
PORR a.s.
 3 23,589,090
Kaiserbau s. r. o.
 2 16,736,807
Other suppliers 104 541,246,116

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

34%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 10% (1 from 10)
Nonprice competition 13% (5 from 38)
Division into lots 11% (4 from 38)
E-auction 0% (0 from 38)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 38)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

68%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 363,299,979
Small scale tenders 156,649,908
Unregulated purchases 619,659,833
Total 1,139,609,720

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Regenerace nám. Republiky
Contract modification 		10,366,220 369,608 (+4%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

80%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 10%
Average requirements modifications count 0.90
Average decision length 56.67 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 38)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 38)
Missing buyer ID 5% (2 from 38)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 38)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 38)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 38)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

66%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 89% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.32 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 38 tenders under the law)
0-250K 2 tenders
250K-500K 12 tenders
500K-1000K 25 tenders
1000K+ 50 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.