Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Blansko

IČO 00279943

Good buyer. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.


Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
III/379 37 Blansko přemostění
Works for complete or part construction and civil engineering work
Ø4 in industry
ZŠ TGM přístavba jídelny a školní kuchyně
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Blansko - obnova podzámčí - Zámek 3
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Blansko – most, komunikace a parkoviště u Salmova mlýna
Construction work for water and sewage pipelines
Ø5 in industry
Regenerace sídliště Zborovce, III. etapa
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Metrostav DIZ s.r.o.
1 218,225,694
IMOS Brno, a.s.
1 65,899,822
3 27,382,676
PORR a.s.
3 23,589,090
Kaiserbau s. r. o.
2 16,736,807
Other suppliers 104 541,246,116

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 10% (1 from 10)
Nonprice competition 13% (5 from 38)
Division into lots 11% (4 from 38)
E-auction 0% (0 from 38)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 38)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 363,299,979
Small scale tenders 156,649,908
Unregulated purchases 619,659,833
Total 1,139,609,720

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Regenerace nám. Republiky
Contract modification
10,366,220 369,608 (+4%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 38)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 38)
Missing buyer ID 5% (2 from 38)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 38)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 38)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 38)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 89% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.32 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 38 tenders under the law)
0-250K 2 tenders
250K-500K 12 tenders
500K-1000K 25 tenders
1000K+ 50 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.