Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Trutnov

IČO 00278360

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's

31.
ranking
76%
zIndex
Show average values  
49%
Bidder participation
87%
Winner concentration
40%
Pro-competitive tools
61%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
94%
Competitive contracting
60%
Consistent conduct
99%
Journal data quality
94%
Buyer profile data quality
80%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

49%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Rekonstrukce kina Vesmír
Construction work for buildings relating to leisure, sports, culture, lodging and restaurants
3
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce venkovního koupaliště
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce pěší zóny v ulici Horská
Various surface works
4
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce sportovního stadionu Základní školy, Trutnov, R. Frimla 816
Construction work for sports facilities
6
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce komunikace Nad Jezem
Construction work for highways, roads
5
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

87%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
BAK stavební společnost, a.s.
 2 100,986,667
Gardenline s.r.o.
 1 35,783,578
Sport-Technik Bohemia s.r.o.
 3 29,307,695
REPARE TRUTNOV s.r.o.
 7 25,564,813
BERNDORF BÄDERBAU s.r.o.
 1 20,266,667
Other suppliers 132 362,049,342

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

40%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (1 from 2)
Nonprice competition 15% (3 from 20)
Division into lots 5% (1 from 20)
E-auction 0% (0 from 20)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 20)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

61%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 503,361,589
Small scale tenders 170,901,900
Unregulated purchases 1,138,547,864
Total 1,812,811,353

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

94%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce kina Vesmír
Contract modification 		80,720,000 2,675,051 (+4%)
Sanace vlhkosti sklepních prostorů objektu ZUŠ v ul. Školní č. p. 13 - 1. a 2. etapa (opakovaná zakázka)
Contract modification 		5,523,035 1,121,606 (+21%)
Sanace vlhkosti sklepních prostorů objektu ZUŠ v ul. Školní č. p. 13 - 3. a 4. etapa
Contract modification 		1,835,840 296,312 (+17%)
III/3012 Trutnov - Radeč
Contract modification 		1,829,000 223,500 (+13%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 22)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 22)
Missing buyer ID 5% (1 from 22)
Missing call for tenders 5% (1 from 22)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 22)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 22)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

94%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.14 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 22 tenders under the law)
0-250K 15 tenders
250K-500K 39 tenders
500K-1000K 25 tenders
1000K+ 22 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.