Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Chrudim

IČO 00270211

Good buyer. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

2.
ranking
83%
zIndex
Show average values  
65%
Bidder participation
99%
Winner concentration
47%
Pro-competitive tools
55%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
96%
Competitive contracting
85%
Consistent conduct
100%
Journal data quality
91%
Buyer profile data quality
90%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

65%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Výstavba splaškové kanalizace Medlešice
Sewer construction work
6
Ø6 in industry
Terminál veřejné dopravy v Chrudimi
Structures construction work
5
Ø4 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu MŠ U Stadionu 755, Chrudim
Construction work
16
Ø4 in industry
Dopravní napojení sportovišť města Chrudim
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads
7
Ø6 in industry
Protipovodňový varovný a informační systém města Chrudim
Electrical machinery, apparatus, equipment and consumables; lighting
2
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

99%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Agrostav Pardubice a.s.
 1 63,526,260
VIKTORSTAV s.r.o.
 1 22,949,900
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
 1 17,246,945
MATEX HK s.r.o.
 1 17,246,945
E.ON Energie, a.s.
 1 10,806,464
Other suppliers 83 261,373,838

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

47%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (3 from 6)
Nonprice competition 20% (3 from 15)
Division into lots 7% (1 from 15)
E-auction 0% (0 from 15)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 15)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

55%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 178,099,092
Small scale tenders 135,691,011
Unregulated purchases 732,993,066
Total 1,046,783,169

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Oprava opláštění čp. 1 stará radnice, Resselovo náměstí, I. a II. etapa
Contract modification 		6,070,385 1,207,938 (+20%)
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu MŠ U Stadionu 755, Chrudim
Contract modification 		22,949,900 660,375 (+3%)
Dopravní napojení sportovišť města Chrudim
Contract modification 		10,485,360 100,322 (+1%)
Rekonstrukce odborných učeben včetně zajištění bezbariérovosti v ZŠ Školní náměstí, budova Sladkovského
Contract modification 		3,798,000 91,355 (+3%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

85%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.60
Average decision length 63.80 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 16)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 16)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 16)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

91%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 15 tenders under the law)
0-250K 5 tenders
250K-500K 14 tenders
500K-1000K 23 tenders
1000K+ 31 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

90%
average 81%

Buyer did receive excellent feedback from its tender participants.