Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Klatovy

IČO 00255661

Good buyer. SUPPLIER_FEEDBACK_TRUE_2 Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's

5.
ranking
79%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

55%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
I/27 Klatovy přeložka 1. stavba
Road construction works
7
Ø6 in industry
Výběr provozovatele městské autobusové dopravy v Klatovech II.
Public road transport services
3
Ø3 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti bytového domu čp. 391-393/III, Klatovy
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry
Oprava povrchu komunikací a výměna vodovodu a kanalizace v Klatovech 2019, 2. část
Construction work
5
Ø4 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy Kulturního domu v Klatovech
Construction work
1
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

89%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SILNICE GROUP a.s.
1 863,350,721
Silnice Klatovy a.s.
16 189,147,532
STAFIKO stav s.r.o.
4 72,874,409
Klatovská dopravní společnost s.r.o.
1 58,475,000
Lesní stavby, s.r.o.
6 51,702,900
Other suppliers 89 1,401,502,532

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

43%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 57% (4 from 7)
Nonprice competition 10% (5 from 52)
Division into lots 12% (6 from 52)
E-auction 2% (1 from 52)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 52)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

79%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,219,042,357
Small scale tenders 143,332,881
Unregulated purchases 801,911,239
Total 2,164,286,477

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

98%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Skládka TKO Štěpánovice - realizace III. části III. etapy + rekultivace I. části III. etapy
Contract modification
19,955,707 2,433,361 (+13%)
Klatovy, VDJ Hůrka 2 - Sanace akumulačních nádrží
Contract modification
9,283,660 1,791,232 (+20%)
Plavecký bazén Klatovy – oprava vstupní haly, šaten a hygienických zařízení – I. etapa
Contract modification
6,983,482 598,410 (+9%)
Regenerace panelového sídliště Pod Hůrkou, Klatovy - 2. etapa
Contract modification
9,150,504 451,488 (+5%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

70%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 2.40
Average decision length 87.40 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 54)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 54)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 54)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 54)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 54)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 54)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

60%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.11 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 53 tenders under the law)
0-250K 5 tenders
250K-500K 3 tenders
500K-1000K 12 tenders
1000K+ 28 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

100%
average 81%

Buyer did receive excellent feedback from its tender participants.