Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Jindřichův Hradec

IČO 00246875

Good buyer. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

21.
ranking
77%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

66%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Nakládání s komunálním odpadem V JINDŘICHOVĚ HRADCI v letech 2021 - 2025
Refuse and waste related services
2
Ø1 in industry
Rekonstrukce 5. Základní školy Jindřichův Hradec, Vajgar 692
Construction work for school buildings
2
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce ulice Václavská, Jindřichův Hradec - 4. etapa
Construction work for highways, roads
2
Ø5 in industry
Dodávka a instalace digitálního planetária do hvězdárny prof. Františka Nušla, Jindřichův Hradec včetně poskytnutí servisních služeb a záruky
Optical instruments
2
Ø1 in industry
Rekonstrukce ulice Václavská, Jindřichův Hradec – 2. etapa
Construction work for highways, roads
6
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

94%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
AVE CZ odpadové hospodářství s.r.o.
1 73,104,850
JINDŘICHOHRADECKÉ MONTÁŽE s.r.o.
4 39,131,643
L.M.electric s.r.o.
1 39,059,014
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
10 28,265,088
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
2 26,466,302
Other suppliers 90 388,816,303

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

40%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (3 from 6)
Nonprice competition 21% (7 from 34)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 34)
E-auction 0% (0 from 34)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 34)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

68%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 520,780,808
Small scale tenders 116,099,785
Unregulated purchases 728,078,686
Total 1,364,959,280

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

78%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Provozování městské hromadné dopravy v Jindřichově Hradci - přechodné období
Emergency
- 18,000,000
Parkoviště a chodníky Vajgar - Řečička, Jindřichův Hradec
Contract modification
6,853,067 452,349 (+7%)
Rekonstrukce ulice Pravdova – terminál MHD a VLD, Jindřichův Hradec
Contract modification
6,654,071 251,023 (+4%)
Přístavba 2. MŠ Hvězdárna, Jindřichův Hradec
Contract modification
10,868,022 217,477 (+3%)
Chodník Otín u Jindřichova Hradce podél silnice II/164
Contract modification
4,573,861 176,205 (+4%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

80%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 20%
Average requirements modifications count 0.60
Average decision length 101.50 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 39)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 39)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 39)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 39)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 39)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 3% (1 from 39)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

68%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.05 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 37 tenders under the law)
0-250K 1 tender
250K-500K 3 tenders
500K-1000K 23 tenders
1000K+ 29 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

100%
average 81%

Buyer did receive excellent feedback from its tender participants.