Good buyer. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's Buyer does not avoid following procurement law.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
---|---|
Výběr provozovatele MHD v Příbrami 2019 - 2029
Road transport services |
1
Ø4 in industry |
Stavba kanalizace a obnova vodovodní sítě v Lazci
Construction work |
9
Ø4 in industry |
Domov seniorů - Příbram VII, ul. Žežická
Construction work |
5
Ø4 in industry |
Rekonstrukce VH sítí města Příbram - Příbram ul. Milínská úpravy vodohospodářských sítí
Construction work |
1
Ø4 in industry |
DNS na výstavbu, opravy a údržbu pozemních komunikací města Příbram - Rekonstrukce ul. Na Leštině I etapa, Příbram
Road-maintenance works |
4
Ø3 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
---|---|---|
ARRIVA STŘEDNÍ ČECHY s.r.o. |
1 | 574,310,425 |
INVESSALES, spol. s r.o. |
71 | 186,099,067 |
STRABAG a.s. |
41 | 135,966,493 |
1. SčV, a.s. |
8 | 85,342,373 |
Vodohospodářské stavby, společnost s ručením omezeným |
39 | 75,457,555 |
Other suppliers | 392 | 1,321,910,199 |
Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
---|---|---|
ARRIVA STŘEDNÍ ČECHY s.r.o. |
1 | 574,310,425 |
INVESSALES, spol. s r.o. |
71 | 186,099,067 |
STRABAG a.s. |
41 | 135,966,493 |
1. SčV, a.s. |
8 | 85,342,373 |
Vodohospodářské stavby, společnost s ručením omezeným |
39 | 75,457,555 |
Staler spol. s r.o. |
19 | 60,015,580 |
FK Bau, a.s. |
1 | 56,843,704 |
SILNICE NEPOMUK s.r.o. |
23 | 38,603,996 |
ANDAF-TIER s.r.o. |
34 | 37,308,307 |
Amper Market, a.s. |
1 | 18,856,513 |
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
1 | 14,857,382 |
AutoCont CZ a.s. |
2 | 11,849,000 |
MARBES CONSULTING s.r.o. |
3 | 11,580,000 |
BES s.r.o. |
24 | 11,418,607 |
EUbuilding a.s. |
1 | 10,855,258 |
Vodohospodářský rozvoj a výstavba a.s. |
13 | 10,155,033 |
OB-LIGO realizace staveb s.r.o. |
6 | 9,412,516 |
MEP spol. s r.o. |
6 | 8,618,035 |
ROBSTAV stavby k.s. |
4 | 6,860,385 |
Výtahy Příbram s.r.o. |
3 | 6,123,543 |
LAMA PB s.r.o. |
3 | 6,104,256 |
PSDS s.r.o. |
23 | 5,563,000 |
Comont s.r.o. |
4 | 5,274,042 |
DŘEVOTVAR - ŘEMESLA a STAVBY, s.r.o. |
4 | 5,169,600 |
W.H.A. system, spol. s r. o. |
1 | 4,992,364 |
Pražské vodovody a kanalizace, a.s. |
1 | 4,263,500 |
ČNES dopravní stavby, a.s. |
4 | 3,952,020 |
Water & Heat Systems, s. r. o. |
1 | 3,699,584 |
h - projekt s.r.o. |
1 | 3,390,000 |
PROVOD - inženýrská společnost, s.r.o. |
1 | 3,333,333 |
Sweco Hydroprojekt a.s. |
1 | 3,333,333 |
BRNOFROST spol. s r.o. |
1 | 3,297,100 |
Rychlé stavby s.r.o. |
2 | 3,234,651 |
Roddom s.r.o. |
1 | 3,230,000 |
IZOP-PB s.r.o. |
2 | 3,033,548 |
SVARTECH s. r. o. |
1 | 2,998,836 |
MY DVA group a.s. |
1 | 2,942,864 |
TEZAS servis a.s. |
1 | 2,790,000 |
INUS Příbram s.r.o. |
1 | 2,667,725 |
HaskoningDHV Czech Republic, spol. s r.o. |
2 | 1,989,000 |
OKNOPLASTIK s.r.o. |
2 | 1,920,783 |
STREETPARK s.r.o. |
1 | 1,838,729 |
PORR a.s. |
1 | 1,755,945 |
SAMAB PRESS GROUP, a.s. |
4 | 1,712,480 |
MIDAKON s.r.o. |
5 | 1,705,000 |
TO SYSTEM s.r.o. |
2 | 1,578,555 |
KHL-EKO, a.s. |
1 | 1,525,147 |
INGEM a.s. |
5 | 1,470,000 |
SAFE TREES, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,366,500 |
NORAM spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,313,900 |
Martin Pudil |
3 | 1,224,502 |
GamaServis, s.r.o. |
2 | 1,143,165 |
BUNG CZ s.r.o. |
7 | 1,072,200 |
WACOM, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,053,346 |
Löw a spol., s.r.o. (společník Společnosti pro zpracování plánu ÚSES pro ORP Příbram) |
1 | 993,000 |
AGERIS s.r.o. |
1 | 993,000 |
MDP GEO, s.r.o. |
1 | 956,500 |
Tomáš Opočenský |
1 | 952,241 |
Atelier Rákos s.r.o. |
1 | 950,000 |
AUTOCONT a.s. |
3 | 839,500 |
Silnice TS s.r.o. |
4 | 830,888 |
AirPlus, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 748,592 |
ELTODO OSVĚTLENÍ, s.r.o. |
1 | 734,914 |
GREGOR - projekt invest, s.r.o. |
1 | 695,000 |
Kucián statika s.r.o. |
1 | 638,000 |
Ing. arch. Jitka Brychtová |
1 | 620,000 |
DRUPOL autodružstvo |
1 | 559,433 |
ista Česká republika s.r.o. |
1 | 508,602 |
FleetCom s.r.o. |
1 | 489,836 |
BOXED, s.r.o. |
1 | 452,289 |
REFLEX Zlín, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 409,310 |
Ing. Jan Zelenka |
1 | 397,208 |
ADVISIA s.r.o. |
1 | 386,000 |
Maddeo CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 352,490 |
PITTER DESIGN, s.r.o. |
1 | 347,777 |
Ing. Lucie Janoušová |
1 | 328,000 |
SIOS CZ, s.r.o. |
1 | 316,212 |
MOSTY Jan Hofman s.r.o. |
1 | 313,000 |
PRORESTA, s.r.o. |
1 | 303,393 |
RA Software s.r.o. |
1 | 274,164 |
DRUPOL, v.d. |
1 | 243,347 |
REINVEST spol. s r.o. |
1 | 234,000 |
Bohemik s.r.o. |
1 | 231,540 |
DLOUHY TECHNOLOGY s.r.o. |
1 | 212,298 |
PROFITEAM topení - voda - plyn s.r.o. |
1 | 199,575 |
Ing. Petr Špinka |
2 | 190,000 |
Ing. Milan Sigmund |
1 | 155,000 |
POPROKAN s.r.o. |
2 | 147,492 |
Veronika Bejčková |
2 | 145,522 |
IR INSPECTIONS s.r.o. |
1 | 144,200 |
Zdeněk Žáček |
1 | 128,793 |
Vodafone Czech Republic a.s. |
1 | 108,333 |
Servodata a.s. |
1 | 89,000 |
Zdeněk Kasal |
1 | 44,085 |
NEWTON Media, a.s. |
1 | 3,900 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
Tool | Contracts count |
---|---|
Extended deadlines | 27% (4 from 15) |
Nonprice competition | 37% (23 from 63) |
Division into lots | 32% (20 from 63) |
E-auction | 5% (3 from 63) |
Innovative procedure | 2% (1 from 63) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
---|---|
Public procurement | 1,467,484,036 |
Small scale tenders | 216,506,045 |
Unregulated purchases | 0 |
Total | 1,574,658,515 |
Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
---|---|
Durable property purchases | 626,231,468 |
Material consumption | 38,707,899 |
Energy consumption | 51,462,445 |
Other consumption | 0 |
Sold goods | 593,704 |
Activation of durable property | 0 |
Activation of consumable property | 0 |
Change of stock | 0 |
Maintenance and repairs | 451,390,067 |
Travel costs | 1,717,299 |
Representation costs | 723,754 |
In-house services | 0 |
Other services | 206,074,371 |
Small long-term property costs | 13,082,825 |
Other costs | 184,674,684 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
---|---|---|
Vodojem HUSA a související stavba vodovodu na Svaté Hoře (2) Contract modification |
14,769,219 | 4,285,687 (+30%) |
Domov seniorů - Příbram VII, ul. Žežická Contract modification |
27,394,526 | 3,624,317 (+14%) |
Stavba kanalizace a obnova vodovodní sítě v Lazci Contract modification |
56,843,704 | 3,513,479 (+7%) |
Rekonstrukce VH sítí města Příbram Contract modification |
25,159,603 | 3,315,373 (+14%) |
Úprava veřejného prostranství pěší zóny Cíl Contract modification |
7,750,000 | 1,584,811 (+21%) |
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
---|---|---|
Vodojem HUSA a související stavba vodovodu na Svaté Hoře (2) Contract modification |
14,769,219 | 4,285,687 (+30%) |
Domov seniorů - Příbram VII, ul. Žežická Contract modification |
27,394,526 | 3,624,317 (+14%) |
Stavba kanalizace a obnova vodovodní sítě v Lazci Contract modification |
56,843,704 | 3,513,479 (+7%) |
Rekonstrukce VH sítí města Příbram Contract modification |
25,159,603 | 3,315,373 (+14%) |
Úprava veřejného prostranství pěší zóny Cíl Contract modification |
7,750,000 | 1,584,811 (+21%) |
Stoka V zkapacitnění 2 Contract modification |
7,833,598 | 819,738 (+11%) |
Modernizace městského informačního systému MěÚ Příbram – Portál občana Contract modification |
5,690,000 | 72,000 (+2%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
Type of flaw | Result |
---|---|
Issued tenders without published result | 7% |
Cancelled contracts | 14% |
Average requirements modifications count | 1.29 |
Average decision length | 106.92 days |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
Type of flaw | Contracts count |
---|---|
Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 66) |
Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 66) |
Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 66) |
Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 66) |
Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 66) |
Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 66) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
Check | Result | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 90% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.41 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 61 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.