Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Příbram

IČO 00243132

Good buyer. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's Buyer does not avoid following procurement law.

5.
ranking
79%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

41%
average 51%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

86%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
ARRIVA STŘEDNÍ ČECHY s.r.o.
1 574,310,425
INVESSALES, spol. s r.o.
71 186,099,067
STRABAG a.s.
41 135,966,493
1. SčV, a.s.
8 85,342,373
Vodohospodářské stavby, společnost s ručením omezeným
39 75,457,555
Other suppliers 392 1,321,910,199

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

68%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 27% (4 from 15)
Nonprice competition 37% (23 from 63)
Division into lots 32% (20 from 63)
E-auction 5% (3 from 63)
Innovative procedure 2% (1 from 63)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,467,484,036
Small scale tenders 216,506,045
Unregulated purchases 0
Total 1,574,658,515

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

95%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Vodojem HUSA a související stavba vodovodu na Svaté Hoře (2)
Contract modification
14,769,219 4,285,687 (+30%)
Domov seniorů - Příbram VII, ul. Žežická
Contract modification
27,394,526 3,624,317 (+14%)
Stavba kanalizace a obnova vodovodní sítě v Lazci
Contract modification
56,843,704 3,513,479 (+7%)
Rekonstrukce VH sítí města Příbram
Contract modification
25,159,603 3,315,373 (+14%)
Úprava veřejného prostranství pěší zóny Cíl
Contract modification
7,750,000 1,584,811 (+21%)

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 66)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 66)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 66)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 66)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 66)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 66)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

69%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 90% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.41 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 61 tenders under the law)
0-250K 40 tenders
250K-500K 29 tenders
500K-1000K 37 tenders
1000K+ 37 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.