Good buyer. The competition for contracts is high. Buyer supports competition by providing extended deadlines for tender submissions.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Rekonstrukce bytového domu Dejvická 184/4
Construction work |
6
Ø4 in industry |
|
VZ/3/2021 - ZŠ E. Destinnové a ZŠ nám. Svobody 2 - půdní vestavba
Construction work |
7
Ø4 in industry |
|
VZ/2/2021 - ZŠ J. A. Komenského - půdní vestavba
Construction work |
6
Ø4 in industry |
|
MŠ Tychonova - celková rekonstrukce
Construction work for school buildings |
7
Ø4 in industry |
|
Poskytování služby typu Hybridní pošty
Postal and telecommunications services |
0
Ø2 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
KONSIT a.s. |
3 | 102,817,632 |
|
Metrostav DIZ s.r.o. |
1 | 87,582,673 |
|
Raeder & Falge s.r.o. |
1 | 64,817,363 |
|
SSK - stavby s.r.o. |
4 | 42,259,802 |
|
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s. |
4 | 28,542,188 |
| Other suppliers | 95 | 439,766,190 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
KONSIT a.s. |
3 | 102,817,632 |
|
Metrostav DIZ s.r.o. |
1 | 87,582,673 |
|
Raeder & Falge s.r.o. |
1 | 64,817,363 |
|
SSK - stavby s.r.o. |
4 | 42,259,802 |
|
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s. |
4 | 28,542,188 |
|
ASGK Design s.r.o. |
1 | 23,843,100 |
|
PROXIMA a.s. |
1 | 19,764,444 |
|
PRO URBAN s.r.o. |
2 | 18,417,616 |
|
Branická stavební s. r. o. |
6 | 16,898,582 |
|
AXIOM REAL, spol. s r.o. |
2 | 12,468,000 |
|
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
6 | 10,820,430 |
|
Vekra stavební s.r.o. |
4 | 10,636,287 |
|
OFFICE-CENTRUM s.r.o. |
1 | 7,245,456 |
|
KV-Konstrukt Stav s.r.o. |
6 | 6,936,616 |
|
re:architekti studio s.r.o. |
2 | 6,220,000 |
|
PROFI KLIMA solution s.r.o. |
1 | 5,494,600 |
|
VVS - česko-moravské výtahy, s.r.o. |
1 | 4,988,250 |
|
TOILETDESIGN s.r.o. |
1 | 4,197,600 |
|
Česká pošta, s.p. |
1 | 4,000,000 |
|
VYSSPA Sports Technology s.r.o. |
1 | 3,885,909 |
|
Sibre s.r.o. |
5 | 3,222,500 |
|
Sport-Technik Bohemia s.r.o. |
1 | 3,095,426 |
|
S & S TZB, s.r.o. |
1 | 3,054,731 |
|
LAMA PB s.r.o. |
1 | 2,949,841 |
|
SPORTOVNÍ PODLAHY ZLÍN, s.r.o. |
1 | 2,930,177 |
|
VPÚ DECO PRAHA a.s. |
1 | 2,928,500 |
|
Deseado EU s.r.o. |
5 | 2,913,072 |
|
ADEVITA s.r.o. |
1 | 2,895,886 |
|
KyraStav spol. s r.o. |
1 | 2,891,912 |
|
"FoxCom", s.r.o. |
1 | 2,839,200 |
|
OTISTAV s.r.o. |
2 | 2,756,603 |
|
ZAHRADNÍ ARCHITEKTURA TÁBOR s.r.o. |
1 | 2,695,626 |
|
Ing.arch.Petr Šindelář |
1 | 2,688,500 |
|
Ing.arch. Petr Šindelář |
1 | 2,688,500 |
|
LENNOX architekti, s.r.o. a RANGERKA 5 s.r.o. |
1 | 2,250,000 |
|
FM servis Praha CZ s.r.o. |
2 | 2,109,844 |
|
CENTRA a.s. |
2 | 2,077,915 |
|
SEVEn Energy s.r.o. |
1 | 1,982,000 |
|
APIDA s.r.o. |
1 | 1,881,353 |
|
Mape Group Construction s.r.o |
2 | 1,880,377 |
|
AWIGO s.r.o. |
1 | 1,876,357 |
|
BOMART spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,850,100 |
|
Ing. Filip Nehonský |
1 | 1,780,200 |
|
LaWei Stav s.r.o. |
1 | 1,699,035 |
|
BON, s.r.o. |
2 | 1,604,728 |
|
NEO BUILDER a. s. |
1 | 1,590,263 |
|
Univers Tech s.r.o. |
1 | 1,356,133 |
|
ELITT stavební s.r.o. |
1 | 1,277,346 |
|
Basano s.r.o. |
1 | 1,235,853 |
|
QUADRA PROJECT s.r.o. |
2 | 1,232,000 |
|
INSTAMA, s.r.o. |
2 | 1,197,002 |
|
BT-VUSTE , spol. s r.o. |
2 | 1,165,919 |
|
Desima Technology s. r. o. |
1 | 907,780 |
|
A.D.N.S.PRODUCTION s.r.o. |
1 | 900,000 |
|
T.C. classic, a.s. |
1 | 798,000 |
|
DOMISTAV CZ a.s. |
1 | 765,765 |
|
ERUDUM Praha, s.r.o. |
1 | 765,604 |
|
D-PLUS PROJEKTOVÁ A INŽENÝRSKÁ a.s. |
1 | 747,000 |
|
MVM Stav, s.r.o. |
1 | 608,020 |
|
Radek Hejduk |
1 | 594,798 |
|
REABOTON s.r.o. |
1 | 513,489 |
|
MIKRO PRAHA spol. s r.o. |
1 | 330,000 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 33% (4 from 12) |
| Nonprice competition | 31% (11 from 36) |
| Division into lots | 0% (0 from 36) |
| E-auction | 0% (0 from 36) |
| Innovative procedure | 14% (5 from 36) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Rekonstrukce bytového domu Dejvická 184/4 Contract modification |
92,215,548 | 16,215,233 (+18%) |
|
MŠ Tychonova - celková rekonstrukce Contract modification |
32,436,431 | 4,901,397 (+16%) |
|
Zajištění zpracování a odesílání písemností v hybridním režimu pro ÚMČ Praha 6 Technical exclusivity |
- | 4,000,000 |
|
VZ/3/2021 - ZŠ E. Destinnové a ZŠ nám. Svobody 2 - půdní vestavba Contract modification |
87,582,673 | 1,810,552 (+3%) |
|
Řešení vlhkosti a fasády objektu Obora Hvězda 1, Praha 6 - Liboc Contract modification |
9,764,108 | 1,073,870 (+11%) |
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Rekonstrukce bytového domu Dejvická 184/4 Contract modification |
92,215,548 | 16,215,233 (+18%) |
|
MŠ Tychonova - celková rekonstrukce Contract modification |
32,436,431 | 4,901,397 (+16%) |
|
Zajištění zpracování a odesílání písemností v hybridním režimu pro ÚMČ Praha 6 Technical exclusivity |
- | 4,000,000 |
|
VZ/3/2021 - ZŠ E. Destinnové a ZŠ nám. Svobody 2 - půdní vestavba Contract modification |
87,582,673 | 1,810,552 (+3%) |
|
Řešení vlhkosti a fasády objektu Obora Hvězda 1, Praha 6 - Liboc Contract modification |
9,764,108 | 1,073,870 (+11%) |
|
VZ/1/2020 - MŠ Janákova - přístavba 2 třídní mateřské školy včetně rekonstrukce stávajícího objektu - PD Contract modification |
2,928,500 | 187,580 (+7%) |
|
Rekonstrukce střešního pláště bytového domu náměstí Svobody 728/1, Praha 6 - Bubeneč Contract modification |
16,404,873 | 100,511 (+1%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 7% |
| Cancelled contracts | 0% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 1.14 |
| Average decision length | 100.77 days |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 47) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 47) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 47) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 47) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 47) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 47) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 98% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.64 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 44 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
