Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Habartov

IČO 00259314

Buyer does not support competition by using e-auctions, lots or extended deadlines. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

105.
ranking
71%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

55%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
„Stavební úprava ulice Karla Čapka, Habartov“
Construction work for highways, roads
4
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti 1. máje 27-30, Habartov
Restoration work
1
Ø3 in industry
Parkoviště Čs. armády, Habartov
Construction work for highways, roads
7
Ø5 in industry
REKONSTRUKCE VEŘEJNÉHO OSVĚTLENÍ HABARTOV – IV. etapa
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
„Habartov, oprava komunikace na p.č.873“
Construction work for highways, roads
7
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

79%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Stavební společnost VARO, s.r.o.
3 23,689,253
bss BÁŇSKÁ STAVEBNÍ SPOLEČNOST s.r.o.
2 23,385,869
ALGON, a.s.
3 11,615,290
Werner Hüttner
2 10,983,015
SOKOSTAV HT, s.r.o.
7 8,989,858
Other suppliers 28 86,586,232

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

0%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 9)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 9)
E-auction 0% (0 from 9)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 9)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

70%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 137,020,437
Small scale tenders 47,375,568
Unregulated purchases 190,419,524
Total 374,815,529

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 9)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 9)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 9)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

69%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.89 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 9 tenders under the law)
0-250K 3 tenders
250K-500K 1 tender
500K-1000K 11 tenders
1000K+ 11 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.