Small cities • 2022

Obec Chýně

IČO 00241296

Buyer does not use tools to support competition. Enough firms are competing for contracts.

70.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

72%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Chýně_chodník podél ulice Hlavní_etapa I.
Paths and other metalled surfaces
8
Ø4 in industry
Rozšíření ČOV Chýně
Sewage work
3
Ø6 in industry
Svoz a likvidace komunálního odpadu, svoz a využití některých samostatně vytříděných využitelných složek komunálního odpadu (papír, sklo a plasty s nápojovými kartony) II.
Refuse collection services
3
Ø1 in industry
Zateplení a úpravy objektu budovy čp. 200 ul. Hlavní v k. ú Chýně (sídlo obecního úřadu) II. - Část 1 - Zateplení budovy
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
5
Ø2 in industry
Protipovodňová opatření obce Chýně
Miscellaneous software package and computer systems
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

100%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
HES stavební s.r.o.
1 10,512,925
VHZ-DIS, spol. s r.o.
1 5,380,038
RUMPOLD-P s.r.o.
1 3,992,790
MOZIS s.r.o.
1 3,257,128
BÁRTEK ROZHLASY s.r.o.
1 2,998,494
Other suppliers 7 13,126,217

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

0%
average 27%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

68%
average 68%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 6)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 6)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 6)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

46%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 83% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.67 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 6 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 2 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 4 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.