Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Rosice

IČO 00282481

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. The competition for contracts is low.

Show average values  
39%
Bidder participation
77%
Winner concentration
27%
Pro-competitive tools
61%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
22%
Competitive contracting
60%
Consistent conduct
98%
Journal data quality
42%
Buyer profile data quality
80%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

39%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Místní komunikace Rozsocháč
Restoration work
9
Ø3 in industry
Revitalizace zámeckého parku v Rosicích - Vegetační úpravy a cestní síť
Horticultural services
5
Ø4 in industry
Úprava komunikace a zpevněných ploch v prostoru sídliště Husova – Rosice - etapa 2020
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
7
Ø2 in industry
Dešťová kanalizace ul. Zbýšovská, Rosice
Construction work for water and sewage pipelines
5
Ø5 in industry
Protipovodňová opatření města Rosice
Electrical machinery, apparatus, equipment and consumables; lighting
3
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

77%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
 5 22,718,530
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s.
 2 12,408,630
Izolservis, spol. s r.o.
 1 8,349,773
Dopravní stavby Brno, s.r.o.
 1 6,489,929
DS DUMA s.r.o.
 2 5,720,101
Other suppliers 22 68,162,806

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

27%
average 27%
Average values displayed

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

61%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 118,665,407
Small scale tenders 26,679,092
Unregulated purchases 239,869,192
Total 385,213,691

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

22%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce kuchyně MŠ Zámecká, Husova čtvrť 1070, Rosice
Outside directive scope 		- 8,349,773
Úprava komunikace a zpevněných ploch v prostoru sídliště Husova - Rosice
Outside directive scope 		- 6,489,929
Dodávka zemního plynu v rámci sdružených služeb dodávky zemního plynu na rok 2023
Not disclosed 		- 4,308,000
Dopravní automobil pro JSDH Rosice
Outside directive scope 		- 2,200,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

98%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 8% (1 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 12)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 12)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 12)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

42%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 75% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 12 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 5 tenders
1000K+ 11 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.