Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Týnec nad Sázavou

IČO 00232904

Buyer does not use tools to support competition. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.


Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
Intenzifikace ČOV Týnec nad Sázavou
Construction works for plants, mining and manufacturing and for buildings relating to the oil and gas industry
Ø4 in industry
Vodovod a kanalizace Krusičany
Sewer construction work
Ø6 in industry
Týnec nad Sázavou chodník podél silnice III/10513,1. etapa
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Obnova místních komunikací ve „starém“ Týnci nad Sázavou
Construction work for highways, roads
Ø5 in industry
FZŠ,Týnec nad Sázavou,Cisternová automobilová stříkačka
Water-tender vehicles
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
OHLA ŽS, a.s.
1 113,188,388
EVT Stavby s.r.o.
1 83,999,000
BES s.r.o.
4 16,995,797
HES stavební s.r.o.
1 13,453,177
THT Polička, s.r.o.
1 6,640,000
Other suppliers 17 146,818,874

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 5)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 7)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 7)
E-auction 0% (0 from 7)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 7)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 142,287,186
Small scale tenders 45,223,652
Unregulated purchases 297,356,626
Total 484,867,463

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.40
Average decision length 74.60 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 7)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 7)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 7)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 6 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 5 tenders
1000K+ 12 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.