Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Týnec nad Sázavou

IČO 00232904

Buyer does not use tools to support competition. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.

51.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

59%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Intenzifikace ČOV Týnec nad Sázavou
Construction works for plants, mining and manufacturing and for buildings relating to the oil and gas industry
7
Ø4 in industry
Vodovod a kanalizace Krusičany
Sewer construction work
6
Ø6 in industry
Týnec nad Sázavou chodník podél silnice III/10513,1. etapa
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Obnova místních komunikací ve „starém“ Týnci nad Sázavou
Construction work for highways, roads
5
Ø5 in industry
FZŠ,Týnec nad Sázavou,Cisternová automobilová stříkačka
Water-tender vehicles
1
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

99%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
OHLA ŽS, a.s.
1 113,188,388
EVT Stavby s.r.o.
1 83,999,000
BES s.r.o.
4 16,995,797
HES stavební s.r.o.
1 13,453,177
THT Polička, s.r.o.
1 6,640,000
Other suppliers 17 146,818,874

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

0%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 5)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 7)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 7)
E-auction 0% (0 from 7)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 7)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

62%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 142,287,186
Small scale tenders 45,223,652
Unregulated purchases 297,356,626
Total 484,867,463

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

70%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.40
Average decision length 74.60 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 7)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 7)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 7)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

73%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 6 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 5 tenders
1000K+ 12 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.