Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Soběslav

IČO 00252921

Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

46%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Nástavba Senior - domu v Soběslavi
Construction work for buildings relating to health and social services, for crematoriums and public conveniences
6
Ø4 in industry
Dopravní terminál Soběslav, odstranění přístavby a stavební úpravy výpravní budovy
Buildings associated with transport
1
Ø4 in industry
SMUTEČNÍ SÍŇ NA HŘBITOVĚ V SOBĚSLAVI – STAVEBNÍ ÚPRAVY
Construction work for buildings relating to health and social services, for crematoriums and public conveniences
1
Ø3 in industry
Předprostor škol v Soběslavi
Paths and other metalled surfaces
4
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy, přístavba a nástavba MŠ Soběslav, Nerudova 711/II
Construction work for kindergarten buildings
2
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

0%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Spilka a Říha s.r.o.
5 81,324,486
STRABAG a.s.
1 6,992,980

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

20%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 29% (2 from 7)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 7)
E-auction 0% (0 from 7)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 7)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

57%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 178,271,013
Small scale tenders 6,992,980
Unregulated purchases 380,626,000
Total 565,889,993

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 14% (1 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 7)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 7)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 7)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

46%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.43 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 7 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 1 tender

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.