Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Lišov

IČO 00245178

Buyer does not support competition by using e-auctions, lots or extended deadlines. Relatively small fraction of purchases is spent according to law.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

41%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Stavební úpravy přízemí MěÚ Lišov_Knihovna a archiv města
Construction work for art and cultural buildings
4
Ø2 in industry
Revitalizace parkoviště a vstupního parteru, KD Lišov
Parking lot construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Lišov - Vodovod Levín a Hrutov
Construction work for water and sewage pipelines
6
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy ulice Souběžná - opravy povrchů, včetně VO a rekonstrukce vodovodu a kanalizace
Construction work for highways, roads
7
Ø5 in industry
Oprava chodníků a komunikace - ulice Topolová a U Stadionu, Lišov
Construction work for highways, roads
8
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

96%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
BUILD SERVICE stavební spol. s r. o.
1 12,594,957
STRABAG a.s.
2 8,446,933
Amitera s.r.o.
1 7,596,056
K - BUILDING CB, a.s.
1 7,579,920
KAVEX Bohemia s.r.o.
1 5,034,434
Other suppliers 19 61,517,767

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

0%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 6)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 6)
E-auction 0% (0 from 6)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 6)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

54%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 101,368,226
Small scale tenders 20,893,273
Unregulated purchases 296,771,121
Total 419,032,619

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

91%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Stavební úpravy přízemí MěÚ Lišov_Knihovna a archiv města
Contract modification
12,594,957 1,075,186 (+9%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 6)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 6)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 6)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

44%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 50% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.67 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 6 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 1 tender
500K-1000K 6 tenders
1000K+ 10 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.