Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Bechyně

IČO 00252069

Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms. Purchases are made in legal regime, there is no tendency to portion contracts.

88.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

51%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce Libušiny ulice v Bechyni
Construction work
7
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce Libušiny ulice v Bechyni
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry
Bechyně obnova Na Libuši 6etapa blok bytových domů
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Bechyně, obnova sídl. Na Libuši, 4. etapa – blok bytových domů č.p. 687-697
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
MĚSTO BECHYNĚ SVOZ A ULOŽENÍ KOMUNÁLNÍHO A SEPAROVANÉHO ODPADU
Refuse collection services
1
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

46%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
DAICH spol. s r.o.
6 59,704,316
Stanislav Návrat
8 28,540,335
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
2 8,298,000
COMPAG VOTICE s.r.o.
1 7,000,700
ČEZ ESCO, a.s.
1 6,574,482
Other suppliers 25 113,192,539

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

34%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 7)
Division into lots 14% (1 from 7)
E-auction 57% (4 from 7)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 7)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

86%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 158,868,128
Small scale tenders 163,808,590
Unregulated purchases 109,449,576
Total 432,126,294

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 7)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 7)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 7)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

59%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.14 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 7 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 2 tenders
500K-1000K 4 tenders
1000K+ 19 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.