Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Rumburk

IČO 00261602

Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
Rekonstrukce mostu ev. č. M-16 v ulici Sukova, Rumburk
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Revitalizace sídliště Na Valech
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce střešní nástavby č.p. 18, 19 a 20, ul. Vrchlického, Rumburk
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Výstavba chodníků, ul. U Nemocnice a ul. Sukova, k.ú. Rumburk
Construction work
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SaM silnice a mosty Děčín a.s.
54 27,123,731
Raeder & Falge s.r.o.
1 16,480,989
PORR a.s.
1 13,720,000
Děčínský stavební podnik s.r.o.
1 12,496,277
ZEPS s.r.o.
15 12,121,437
Other suppliers 302 180,858,058

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 27%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 104,145,479
Small scale tenders 137,485,591
Unregulated purchases 303,995,556
Total 545,626,627

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Revitalizace sídliště Na Valech
Contract modification
13,720,000 3,756,077 (+28%)
Sběr a svoz recyklovatelných složek komunálního odpadu - pytlový sběr 2021 - 2022
Previous tender without bids
- 1,470,000
Rekonstrukce střešní nástavby č.p. 18, 19 a 20, ul. Vrchlického, Rumburk
Contract modification
10,029,172 992,648 (+10%)
Contract modification
12,496,277 254,364 (+3%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 13)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 13)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 8% (1 from 13)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 92% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.38 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 13 tenders under the law)
0-250K 206 tenders
250K-500K 56 tenders
500K-1000K 21 tenders
1000K+ 23 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.