Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Rumburk

IČO 00261602

Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

Show average values  
23%
Bidder participation
90%
Winner concentration
10%
Pro-competitive tools
67%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
73%
Competitive contracting
60%
Consistent conduct
98%
Journal data quality
91%
Buyer profile data quality
80%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

23%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Rekonstrukce mostu ev. č. M-16 v ulici Sukova, Rumburk
Construction work
5
Ø4 in industry
Revitalizace sídliště Na Valech
Construction work
7
Ø4 in industry
Centrum POKORUM
Construction work
13
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce střešní nástavby č.p. 18, 19 a 20, ul. Vrchlického, Rumburk
Construction work
1
Ø4 in industry
Výstavba chodníků, ul. U Nemocnice a ul. Sukova, k.ú. Rumburk
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

90%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SaM silnice a mosty Děčín a.s.
 54 27,123,731
Raeder & Falge s.r.o.
 1 16,480,989
PORR a.s.
 1 13,720,000
Děčínský stavební podnik s.r.o.
 1 12,496,277
ZEPS s.r.o.
 15 12,121,437
Other suppliers 302 180,858,058

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

10%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 10)
Division into lots 10% (1 from 10)
E-auction 0% (0 from 10)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 10)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

67%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 104,145,479
Small scale tenders 137,485,591
Unregulated purchases 303,995,556
Total 545,626,627

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

73%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Revitalizace sídliště Na Valech
Contract modification 		13,720,000 3,756,077 (+28%)
Sběr a svoz recyklovatelných složek komunálního odpadu - pytlový sběr 2021 - 2022
Previous tender without bids 		- 1,470,000
Rekonstrukce střešní nástavby č.p. 18, 19 a 20, ul. Vrchlického, Rumburk
Contract modification 		10,029,172 992,648 (+10%)
Centrum POKORUM
Contract modification 		12,496,277 254,364 (+3%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

98%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 13)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 13)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 8% (1 from 13)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

91%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 92% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.38 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 13 tenders under the law)
0-250K 206 tenders
250K-500K 56 tenders
500K-1000K 21 tenders
1000K+ 23 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.