Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Krupka

IČO 00266418

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Buyer profile has high number of errors.

Show average values  
27%
Bidder participation
100%
Winner concentration
20%
Pro-competitive tools
64%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
32%
Competitive contracting
60%
Consistent conduct
100%
Journal data quality
22%
Buyer profile data quality
80%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

27%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
„Stavební úpravy objektu č.p. 271, K. Čapka, Krupka“
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy komunitního domu pro seniory, Krupka
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Nákup elektrické energie 2022 - 2024
Electricity
0
Ø2 in industry
ZAJIŠTĚNÍ PŘÍJEZDOVÉ KOMUNIKACE A HRADEBNÍ ZDI NA HRADĚ KRUPKA - II. VYHLÁŠENÍ
Construction work for highways, roads
2
Ø5 in industry
Předcházení vzniku biologicky rozložitelných odpadů ve městě Krupka
Large containers
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

100%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
NEPRO stavební a.s.
 1 34,906,984
MATURE TEPLICE s.r.o.
 1 29,240,149
STRIX Chomutov, a.s.
 1 10,756,911
innogy Energie, s.r.o.
 1 7,994,371
MEVA-TRADE, s.r.o.
 1 4,088,925
Other suppliers 1 10,756,911

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

20%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 7)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 7)
E-auction 29% (2 from 7)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 7)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

64%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 358,248,844
Small scale tenders 10,785,863
Unregulated purchases 544,648,275
Total 913,682,981

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

32%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Nákup elektrické energie 2022 - 2023 - JŘBU
Previous tender without bids , Emergency 		- 7,994,371
Stavební úpravy komunitního domu pro seniory, Krupka
Contract modification 		29,240,149 7,434,747 (+26%)
„Stavební úpravy objektu č.p. 271, K. Čapka, Krupka“
Contract modification 		34,906,984 4,186,595 (+12%)
ZAJIŠTĚNÍ PŘÍJEZDOVÉ KOMUNIKACE A HRADEBNÍ ZDI NA HRADĚ KRUPKA - II. VYHLÁŠENÍ
Contract modification 		10,756,911 2,728,377 (+26%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 8)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 8)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 8)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

22%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 63% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.75 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 8 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.