Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Obec Líbeznice

IČO 00240427

Buyer does not use tools to support competition. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.

70.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

66%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Nové odborné učebny a modernizace ZŠ a ZUŠ Líbeznice
Construction work
5
Ø4 in industry
Hasičská zbrojnice s manipulačním prostorem a moderní zázemí technických služeb obce Líbeznice
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
ÚPRAVA KOMUNIKACÍ A VEŘEJNÝCH PROSTRANSTVÍ V LOKALITĚ U KOLA A NA HŮRCE
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads
7
Ø6 in industry
Víceúčelové hřiště s kluzištěm pro výuku tělesné výchovy ZŠ Líbeznice
Construction work for sports facilities
1
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce místních komunikací Vnitřní a Pakoměřická, Líbeznice
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

91%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Ekologické a inženýrské stavby, spol. s r.o.
1 32,940,658
GEMA ART GROUP a.s.
1 23,180,549
BARACOM a.s.
4 21,112,574
BES s.r.o.
1 13,133,338
SPORTOVNÍ PODLAHY ZLÍN, s.r.o.
1 11,107,004
Other suppliers 22 113,616,332

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

68%
average 68%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

91%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Hasičská zbrojnice s manipulačním prostorem a moderní zázemí technických služeb obce Líbeznice
Contract modification
23,180,549 2,236,165 (+10%)
Nové odborné učebny a modernizace ZŠ a ZUŠ Líbeznice
Contract modification
32,940,658 131,256 (+1%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 10)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 10)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 10)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

66%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.50 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 10 tenders under the law)
0-250K 3 tenders
250K-500K 4 tenders
500K-1000K 6 tenders
1000K+ 5 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.