Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Klecany

IČO 00240290

Good buyer. Buyer supports competition by providing extended deadlines for tender submissions. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

39.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

64%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce a přístavba objektu Rychty č. p. 74 a 487 ve městě Klecany_III
Construction work
7
Ø4 in industry
Intenzifikace ČOV Klecany
Sewage work
5
Ø4 in industry
Revitalizace a dostavba ZŠ Klecany - 0. etapa
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Zajištění služeb nakládání s odpady pro město Klecany
Refuse and waste related services
2
Ø1 in industry
Nákladní vozidlo pro zimní údržbu a kontejnerovou dopravu
Works trucks
2
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

100%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Ekologické a inženýrské stavby, spol. s r.o.
1 64,999,077
OHL ŽS, a.s.
1 57,888,895
DEREZA, společnost s ručením omezeným
1 27,689,473
FCC Česká republika, s.r.o.
1 3,991,772
HANES s.r.o.
1 3,919,000
Other suppliers 10 136,622,829

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

42%
average 27%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

71%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 195,178,435
Small scale tenders 15,307,791
Unregulated purchases 202,014,322
Total 412,500,548

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

95%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce a přístavba objektu Rychty č. p. 74 a 487 ve městě Klecany_III
Contract modification
64,999,077 2,138,765 (+4%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 20%
Cancelled contracts 20%
Average requirements modifications count 1.20
Average decision length 37.75 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 9)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 9)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 9)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

41%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 88% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 8 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 2 tenders
500K-1000K 2 tenders
1000K+ 2 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.