Good buyer. Buyer supports competition by providing extended deadlines for tender submissions. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Rekonstrukce a přístavba objektu Rychty č. p. 74 a 487 ve městě Klecany_III
Construction work |
7
Ø4 in industry |
|
Intenzifikace ČOV Klecany
Sewage work |
5
Ø4 in industry |
|
Revitalizace a dostavba ZŠ Klecany - 0. etapa
Construction work |
3
Ø4 in industry |
|
Zajištění služeb nakládání s odpady pro město Klecany
Refuse and waste related services |
2
Ø1 in industry |
|
Nákladní vozidlo pro zimní údržbu a kontejnerovou dopravu
Works trucks |
2
Ø1 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
Ekologické a inženýrské stavby, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 64,999,077 |
|
OHL ŽS, a.s. |
1 | 57,888,895 |
|
DEREZA, společnost s ručením omezeným |
1 | 27,689,473 |
|
FCC Česká republika, s.r.o. |
1 | 3,991,772 |
|
HANES s.r.o. |
1 | 3,919,000 |
| Other suppliers | 10 | 136,622,829 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Ekologické a inženýrské stavby, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 64,999,077 |
|
OHL ŽS, a.s. |
1 | 57,888,895 |
|
DEREZA, společnost s ručením omezeným |
1 | 27,689,473 |
|
FCC Česká republika, s.r.o. |
1 | 3,991,772 |
|
HANES s.r.o. |
1 | 3,919,000 |
|
Dřevozpracující výrobní družstvo |
1 | 1,714,940 |
|
GAMA HOLDING Praha a.s. |
1 | 1,528,860 |
|
Wacker Neuson s.r.o. |
1 | 1,281,000 |
|
ENVIROX s.r.o. |
1 | 915,000 |
|
Atelier M.A.A.T., s.r.o. |
1 | 830,000 |
|
EUROPROJEKT, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 699,500 |
|
Road M.A.A.T., s.r.o. |
1 | 495,000 |
|
Meandr AZS, s.r.o. |
1 | 335,798 |
|
PROMAN s.r.o. |
1 | 219,400 |
|
GATO, S.R.O. |
1 | 104,786 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 40% (2 from 5) |
| Nonprice competition | 11% (1 from 9) |
| Division into lots | 11% (1 from 9) |
| E-auction | 0% (0 from 9) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 9) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 195,178,435 |
| Small scale tenders | 15,307,791 |
| Unregulated purchases | 202,014,322 |
| Total | 412,500,548 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 288,602,457 |
| Material consumption | 12,863,164 |
| Energy consumption | 18,949,947 |
| Other consumption | 0 |
| Sold goods | 2,875 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 0 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 29,790,839 |
| Travel costs | 46,003 |
| Representation costs | 346,138 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 53,224,897 |
| Small long-term property costs | 7,815,311 |
| Other costs | 858,918 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Rekonstrukce a přístavba objektu Rychty č. p. 74 a 487 ve městě Klecany_III Contract modification |
64,999,077 | 2,138,765 (+4%) |
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Rekonstrukce a přístavba objektu Rychty č. p. 74 a 487 ve městě Klecany_III Contract modification |
64,999,077 | 2,138,765 (+4%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 20% |
| Cancelled contracts | 20% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 1.20 |
| Average decision length | 37.75 days |
| Contract | Modifications count | Cancelled | Without results | Decision length |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rekonstrukce a přístavba objektu Rychty č. p. 74 a 487 ve městě Klecany II. | 0 | 52 | ||
| Rekonstrukce a přístavba objektu Rychty č. p. 74 a 487 ve městě Klecany_III | 2 | 46 | ||
| Zajištění služeb nakládání s odpady pro město Klecany | 2 | 30 | ||
| Revitalizace a dostavba ZŠ Klecany - 0. etapa | 1 | 23 | ||
| Zajištění služby elektro prací v objektech města Klecany | 1 | > 90 |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 9) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 9) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 9) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 9) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 9) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 9) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 88% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 1.00 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 8 tenders under the law) |
|
| Contract | Type of flaw |
|---|---|
| Zpracování pasportu kanalizace města Klecany | Paid price does strongly differ from contracted price (including amendments) |
| Nákladní vozidlo pro zimní údržbu a kontejnerovou dopravu | Tender not found on any profile |
| Rekonstrukce a přístavba objektu Rychty č. p. 74 a 487 ve městě Klecany_III | Price inconsistent with Journal |
| Rekonstrukce a přístavba objektu Rychty č. p. 74 a 487 ve městě Klecany_III | Payment information missing |
| Zajištění služeb nakládání s odpady pro město Klecany | Bid evaluation protocol missing |
| Zajištění služeb nakládání s odpady pro město Klecany | Payment information missing |
| Revitalizace a dostavba ZŠ Klecany - 0. etapa | Payment information missing |
| Intenzifikace ČOV Klecany | Procedure type inconsistent with Journal |
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
