Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Pečky

IČO 00239607

Often makes mistakes in procurement journal announcements. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

105.
ranking
71%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

55%
average 51%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

94%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
HALKO stavební společnost, s.r.o.
2 10,790,038
PAS Natura s.r.o.
1 6,290,000
TELSIG-servis, spol. s r.o.
1 5,874,416
Atelier 99 s.r.o.
1 5,840,000
JIB s.r.o.
2 5,384,564
Other suppliers 17 50,378,740

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

67%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 63,213,660
Small scale tenders 28,979,036
Unregulated purchases 114,413,826
Total 206,606,521

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

99%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
STAVEBNÍ ÚPRAVY A OBNOVA INTERIÉRU KS PEČKY_DODATEČNÉ VÍCEPRÁCE
Contract modification
899,454 106,492 (+12%)
Výstavba samostatného parkovacího systému P+R, Pečky
Contract modification
5,874,416 5,510 (+1%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

83%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 14)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 14)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 14)
Missing call for tenders 7% (1 from 14)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 14)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 14)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

38%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 64% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.36 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 14 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 6 tenders
1000K+ 5 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.