Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Přeštice

IČO 00257125

Relatively small fraction of purchases is spent according to law. Buyer does not support competition by using e-auctions, lots or extended deadlines.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

53%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce modrého domu v Přešticích
Restoration work
6
Ø4 in industry
Zajištění úklidu města, zimní údržby a sekání travnatých ploch v Přešticích, Skočicích, Žerovicích a Zastávce
Cleaning and sanitation services in urban or rural areas, and related services
1
Ø2 in industry
Přeštice - přestupní uzel
Buildings associated with transport
2
Ø4 in industry
Sběr, přeprava a odstraňování odpadu – Přeštice
Refuse and waste related services
1
Ø1 in industry
REKONSTRUKCE HLAVNÍHO OBJEKTU STŘEDISKO VOLNÉHO ČASU SLUNEČNICE PŘEŠTICE
Construction work for buildings relating to education and research
4
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

84%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
EMPEX Holding s.r.o.
1 66,027,028
Západočeské komunální služby a.s.
2 45,651,855
Silnice Horšovský Týn a.s.
1 22,390,000
BIS, a. s.
1 8,600,006
OMEGA C+M spol. s r.o.
1 7,840,255
Other suppliers 6 109,148,080

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

20%
average 27%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

60%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 194,892,519
Small scale tenders 5,467,212
Unregulated purchases 357,314,312
Total 557,674,042

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

93%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce modrého domu v Přešticích
Contract modification
66,027,028 3,074,030 (+5%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 9)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 9)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 9)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

51%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.33 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 9 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 1 tender
500K-1000K 1 tender
1000K+ 2 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.