Buyer profile has high number of errors. Small number of firms recieve most of contracts.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
„Dům služeb č.p. 653, Horní Slavkov“
Construction work for buildings relating to leisure, sports, culture, lodging and restaurants |
2
Ø4 in industry |
|
Revitalizace areálu kostela sv. Jiří 1. etapa - objekt kostela
Construction work for art and cultural buildings |
3
Ø2 in industry |
|
RS Horní Slavkov, 3. etapa - RPS SO 18a a 18b Úprava veřejných prostranství a vstupu do objektu školy č.p. 786, Horní Slavkov
Paths and other metalled surfaces |
2
Ø4 in industry |
|
Výběr poskytovatele energetických služeb pro realizaci projektu EPC v objektech Města Horní Slavkov
Energy and related services |
2
Ø2 in industry |
|
RS Horní Slavkov, 3. etapa - Parkovací plochy Poštovní Školní č.p. 664-669, Horní Slavkov, SO 101 a 102
Paths and other metalled surfaces |
7
Ø4 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
TIMA spol. s r.o. - obchodně výrobní služby |
2 | 42,852,136 |
|
ISSO - Inženýrské stavby Sokolov, s.r.o. |
1 | 12,582,836 |
|
MVV Energie CZ a.s. |
1 | 9,587,220 |
|
HL Bohemia s.r.o. |
1 | 6,179,486 |
|
Druhá severočeská stavební společnost spol. s r.o. |
1 | 3,589,277 |
| Other suppliers | 1 | 1,834,271 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
TIMA spol. s r.o. - obchodně výrobní služby |
2 | 42,852,136 |
|
ISSO - Inženýrské stavby Sokolov, s.r.o. |
1 | 12,582,836 |
|
MVV Energie CZ a.s. |
1 | 9,587,220 |
|
HL Bohemia s.r.o. |
1 | 6,179,486 |
|
Druhá severočeská stavební společnost spol. s r.o. |
1 | 3,589,277 |
|
BIGGEST construct s.r.o. |
1 | 1,834,271 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 0% (0 from 1) |
| Nonprice competition | 12% (1 from 8) |
| Division into lots | 0% (0 from 8) |
| E-auction and DPS | 0% (0 from 8) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 8) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 393,955,825 |
| Small scale tenders | 38,744,389 |
| Unregulated purchases | 0 |
| Total | 340,873,237 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 135,421,413 |
| Material consumption | 5,613,521 |
| Energy consumption | 10,720,122 |
| Other consumption | 0 |
| Sold goods | 18,058 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 0 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 63,169,291 |
| Travel costs | 114,105 |
| Representation costs | 300,559 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 112,472,212 |
| Small long-term property costs | 9,619,154 |
| Other costs | 3,424,801 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Výběr poskytovatele energetických služeb pro realizaci projektu EPC v objektech Města Horní Slavkov Contract modification |
9,587,220 | 3,149,550 (+33%) |
|
„Dům služeb č.p. 653, Horní Slavkov“ Contract modification |
32,399,265 | 1,600,672 (+5%) |
|
Demolice bytového domu č.p. 247,248,249 v ulici Dolní Příkopy Contract modification |
1,834,271 | 401,108 (+22%) |
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Výběr poskytovatele energetických služeb pro realizaci projektu EPC v objektech Města Horní Slavkov Contract modification |
9,587,220 | 3,149,550 (+33%) |
|
„Dům služeb č.p. 653, Horní Slavkov“ Contract modification |
32,399,265 | 1,600,672 (+5%) |
|
Demolice bytového domu č.p. 247,248,249 v ulici Dolní Příkopy Contract modification |
1,834,271 | 401,108 (+22%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 8) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 8) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 8) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 8) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 8) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 8) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 25% (zakázek z 8 ve Věstníku) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 1.00 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 8 tenders under the law) |
|
| Contract | Type of discrepancy |
|---|---|
| „Dům služeb č.p. 653, Horní Slavkov“ | Tender not found on any profile |
| Revitalizace areálu kostela sv. Jiří 1. etapa - objekt kostela | Tender not found on any profile |
| "Dodávka elektřiny v rámci sdružených služeb dodávky elektřiny v napěťové hladině nízkého napětí na rok 2019 a 2020 pro odběrná míta města Horní Slavkov" | Payment information missing |
| RS Horní Slavkov, 3. etapa - RPS SO 18a a 18b Úprava veřejných prostranství a vstupu do objektu školy č.p. 786, Horní Slavkov | Tender not found on any profile |
| Revitalizace areálu kostela sv. Jiří - 1.etapa - dopravní stavby | Tender not found on any profile |
| Výběr poskytovatele energetických služeb pro realizaci projektu EPC v objektech Města Horní Slavkov | Payment information missing |
| RS Horní Slavkov, 3. etapa - Parkovací plochy Poštovní Školní č.p. 664-669, Horní Slavkov, SO 101 a 102 | Tender not found on any profile |
| Demolice bytového domu č.p. 247,248,249 v ulici Dolní Příkopy | Tender not found on any profile |
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.