Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Obec Jesenice

IČO 00241318

Good buyer. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations.

39.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

61%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Nová základní škola v Jesenici II
Construction work for school buildings
10
Ø4 in industry
Provozování vodovodů a kanalizací ve vlastnictví města Jesenice
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry
Odstranění havarijního stavu ATS Jesenice
Construction work for water and sewage pipelines
2
Ø5 in industry
Intenzifikace ČOV Osnice
Sewage treatment works
5
Ø2 in industry
Vnitřní vybavení ZŠ Zdiměřice II
Furniture
6
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

100%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
PKS stavby a.s.
1 314,000,000
1. SčV, a.s.
1 93,210,000
HYDROTECH s.r.o.
1 12,676,302
MY DVA group a.s.
1 12,335,250
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s.
1 11,057,300
Other suppliers 21 483,805,039

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

74%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 428,061,595
Small scale tenders 107,408,307
Unregulated purchases 435,543,382
Total 971,013,284

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

46%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 29%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00
Average decision length 90.71 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 23)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 23)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 23)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 23)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 23)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 23)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

42%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 83% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.22 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 23 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 2 tenders
500K-1000K 1 tender
1000K+ 4 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.