Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Rousínov

IČO 00292281

Good buyer. SUPPLIER_FEEDBACK_TRUE_2 There are not many contract extensions and ammendments.

39.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

52%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Areál Tyršova Rousínov rekonstrukce objektu SO 05
Restoration work
2
Ø4 in industry
Multifunkční objekt Rousínov - Čechyně
Construction work
11
Ø4 in industry
Obnova sadu, IP a mokřady v prameništi Němčanského potoka
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy ulice Tyršova, Rousínov
Construction work
8
Ø4 in industry
Město Rousínov - komunikace Královopolské Vážany, část - objekty pozemních komunikací
Construction work
13
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

87%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SKR stav, s.r.o.
1 22,425,000
VAŠSTAV, s.r.o.
1 22,425,000
Izolservis, spol. s r.o.
4 20,430,145
KAVYL, spol. s r.o.
3 18,218,091
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
4 7,447,851
Other suppliers 24 104,334,601

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

78%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 168,437,708
Small scale tenders 42,233,645
Unregulated purchases 139,195,279
Total 349,866,631

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

99%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Modernizace objektu bývalé školy Kroužek
Contract modification
4,113,111 307,015 (+8%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 12)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 12)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 12)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

53%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 83% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.42 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 12 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 8 tenders
1000K+ 8 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

100%
average 81%

Buyer did receive excellent feedback from its tender participants.