Small cities • 2020 • past ranking

Město Stříbro

IČO 00260177

Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Buyer does not use tools to support competition.

103.
ranking
68%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

45%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Mateřská škola Prokopa Holého
Construction work for buildings relating to education and research
1
Ø3 in industry
ZATEPLENÍ MŠ SOBĚSLAVOVA, STŘÍBRO
Thermal insulation work
7
Ø3 in industry
Revitalizace Masarykova náměstí v městské památkové zóně ve Stříbře, II. etapa
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads
1
Ø5 in industry
ZATEPLENÍ KINA BENEŠOVA ULICE STŘÍBRO
Thermal insulation work
2
Ø3 in industry
Městský park ve Stříbře – II. etapa, 1. část, Lávka pro pěší
Bridge construction work
1
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

76%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
4 56,256,948
MIRAS - stavitelství a sanace s.r.o.
2 25,883,938
SMP CZ, a.s.
2 13,753,436
KKP stavební s.r.o.
1 10,690,694
MPA stavební spol. s r.o.
6 8,693,142
Other suppliers 28 45,471,775

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

55%
average 58%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 106,321,145
Small scale tenders 43,888,734
Unregulated purchases 338,753,688
Total 488,963,567

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

92%
average 89%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Mateřská škola Prokopa Holého
Contract modification
45,497,892 2,065,997 (+5%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

64%
average 64%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 12)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 12)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 12)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

68%
average 43%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.36 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 11 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 9 tenders
1000K+ 14 tenders